<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lots of gloom for&#160;&#8217;09 local online ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/11/lots-of-gloom-for-09-local-online-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/11/lots-of-gloom-for-09-local-online-ads/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:36:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dadigan</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/11/lots-of-gloom-for-09-local-online-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=336#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Since no growth is expected even if the economy improves, can we infer that online advertisers are finding that their traditional online ads are simply ineffective? 

It seems that advertisers have been equally slow in trying to adapt the Web. And I don&#039;t think they know how to properly evaluate all the data they get on how users interact with content on news sites.

A lot of reporters I know, especially at bigger dailies that have developed a more regional or even national audience because of the Internet, think their stories are read by more people than ever before. Yet, from what I understand, online ads aren&#039;t as valuable as the ads no one looks at in the paper edition? What am I missing?

It seems to me the business model of the future will become more clear once online audiences are properly valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since no growth is expected even if the economy improves, can we infer that online advertisers are finding that their traditional online ads are simply ineffective? </p>
<p>It seems that advertisers have been equally slow in trying to adapt the Web. And I don&#8217;t think they know how to properly evaluate all the data they get on how users interact with content on news sites.</p>
<p>A lot of reporters I know, especially at bigger dailies that have developed a more regional or even national audience because of the Internet, think their stories are read by more people than ever before. Yet, from what I understand, online ads aren&#8217;t as valuable as the ads no one looks at in the paper edition? What am I missing?</p>
<p>It seems to me the business model of the future will become more clear once online audiences are properly valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
