Comments on: How Creative Commons complicates the GateHouse/NYT Co. linking case http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/ A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Gatehouse and NYT Co. settle » Nieman Journalism Lab http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-15545 Gatehouse and NYT Co. settle » Nieman Journalism Lab Mon, 18 May 2009 01:55:17 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-15545 [...] that the parties in GateHouse v. New York Times Co. (see our previous posts here, here, and here) have settled out of court. Details on the settlement to come as soon as we have [...] [...] that the parties in GateHouse v. New York Times Co. (see our previous posts here, here, and here) have settled out of court. Details on the settlement to come as soon as we have [...]

]]> By: GateHouse exec Kirk Davis: “What do you think, we’re stupid? Of course we like linking” » Nieman Journalism Lab http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-15543 GateHouse exec Kirk Davis: “What do you think, we’re stupid? Of course we like linking” » Nieman Journalism Lab Mon, 18 May 2009 01:52:00 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-15543 [...] on the web.” GateHouse was praised in 2006 when it made all of its content available under a Creative Content license, but its lawsuit against The Times Co. has been criticized by Jeff Jarvis and [...] [...] on the web.” GateHouse was praised in 2006 when it made all of its content available under a Creative Content license, but its lawsuit against The Times Co. has been criticized by Jeff Jarvis and [...]

]]> By: MichaelJ http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4139 MichaelJ Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:33:37 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-4139 Thank you for focusing on the Creative Commons issue. It raises a similar issue about non commercial TV/Radio. The line between "this show is made possible by the XYZ corporation or the abc Foundation" and a paid ad is pretty blurry. Maybe this is the tip of the iceberg of a larger discussion about profit v non profit institutions. The difference between a profit making college and a non profit college is ?. The drive to put students in the seats is similar. The opacity of outcomes is similar. The definition of "education" is as blurry or clear without regard to it's non profit status. The price to students at Public Higher Ed is often somewhat less, but still a very significant burden on students. The richer schools might have a lower net cost to students once scholarships are taken into consideration. On the other side, non profit status is sometimes abused as a way to control the uses of capital and still shelter from taxes. It will be interesting how this plays out in an Obama,et al. world. Thank you for focusing on the Creative Commons issue.

It raises a similar issue about non commercial TV/Radio. The line between “this show is made possible by the XYZ corporation or the abc Foundation” and a paid ad is pretty blurry.

Maybe this is the tip of the iceberg of a larger discussion about profit v non profit institutions. The difference between a profit making college and a non profit college is ?. The drive to put students in the seats is similar. The opacity of outcomes is similar. The definition of “education” is as blurry or clear without regard to it’s non profit status.

The price to students at Public Higher Ed is often somewhat less, but still a very significant burden on students. The richer schools might have a lower net cost to students once scholarships are taken into consideration.

On the other side, non profit status is sometimes abused as a way to control the uses of capital and still shelter from taxes.

It will be interesting how this plays out in an Obama,et al. world.

]]> By: Oikeuden edessä» Blog Archive http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4120 Oikeuden edessä» Blog Archive Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:09:23 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-4120 [...] Lisää täältä [...] [...] Lisää täältä [...]

]]> By: ScribeMedia.Org: The Business, Technology and Culture of Digital Media | Commons Commons: What’s Non-Commercial Anyway? http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-3604 ScribeMedia.Org: The Business, Technology and Culture of Digital Media | Commons Commons: What’s Non-Commercial Anyway? Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:09:29 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-3604 [...] the Nieman Journalism Lab notes: GateHouse argues that the Globe’s use of GateHouse text violates the terms of that CC license, [...] [...] the Nieman Journalism Lab notes: GateHouse argues that the Globe’s use of GateHouse text violates the terms of that CC license, [...]

]]> By: GateHouse vs. New York Times Co. update « Virtualjournalist http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/how-creative-commons-complicates-the-gatehouse-linking-case/comment-page-1/#comment-3602 GateHouse vs. New York Times Co. update « Virtualjournalist Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:38:00 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=1121#comment-3602 [...] Co. update By Anthony Salveggi Zachary M. Seward at the Nieman Journalism Lab provides a thought-provoking update of GateHouse Media’s lawsuit against the New York Times Company that raises issues of importance for journalists and media companies alike. Of particular note are [...] [...] Co. update By Anthony Salveggi Zachary M. Seward at the Nieman Journalism Lab provides a thought-provoking update of GateHouse Media’s lawsuit against the New York Times Company that raises issues of importance for journalists and media companies alike. Of particular note are [...]

]]>