<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The benefits (and drawbacks) of keeping web and print separate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Keeping Web and Print Separate &#171; Predicate, LLC &#124; Editorial + Content Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-50030</link>
		<dc:creator>On Keeping Web and Print Separate &#171; Predicate, LLC &#124; Editorial + Content Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=850#comment-50030</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, I’m sure there were projects that were only possible because the washingtonpost.com people were separate from the newsroom. But I’d also bet there would have serious benefits to having them in the newsroom — like infecting print people with some of the culture the web people had developed.via The benefits (and drawbacks) of keeping web and print separate&#160;» Nieman Journalism Lab&#160;»... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, I’m sure there were projects that were only possible because the washingtonpost.com people were separate from the newsroom. But I’d also bet there would have serious benefits to having them in the newsroom — like infecting print people with some of the culture the web people had developed.via The benefits (and drawbacks) of keeping web and print separate&#160;» Nieman Journalism Lab&#160;»&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Thornburg</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Thornburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=850#comment-3563</guid>
		<description>I want to reiterate that I think news organizations need both tight integration and some separation. And I don&#039;t think it has as much to do with online as it does experimentation. I feel the same way about WPNI as I do about Express, the Post Co&#039;s free commuter tab. 

If you think of a Venn diagram with the mothership and the outposts, I think you see a natural movement where the mothership moves so that it encompasses more of the outpost. It&#039;s size doesn&#039;t change, it just moves location on the X,Y axes. 

So that means two things: the mothership is naturally going to give up some print &quot;stuff&quot; as it adds more online &quot;stuff&quot; to its portfolio. But the outposts need to move, too, so that no greater percentage of them get enveloped by the mothership.

If someone wants to animate this for me, I&#039;d be much obliged... I&#039;m drawing air circles here that none of you can see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to reiterate that I think news organizations need both tight integration and some separation. And I don&#8217;t think it has as much to do with online as it does experimentation. I feel the same way about WPNI as I do about Express, the Post Co&#8217;s free commuter tab. </p>
<p>If you think of a Venn diagram with the mothership and the outposts, I think you see a natural movement where the mothership moves so that it encompasses more of the outpost. It&#8217;s size doesn&#8217;t change, it just moves location on the X,Y axes. </p>
<p>So that means two things: the mothership is naturally going to give up some print &#8220;stuff&#8221; as it adds more online &#8220;stuff&#8221; to its portfolio. But the outposts need to move, too, so that no greater percentage of them get enveloped by the mothership.</p>
<p>If someone wants to animate this for me, I&#8217;d be much obliged&#8230; I&#8217;m drawing air circles here that none of you can see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk LaPointe</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk LaPointe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=850#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>In our experience here at The Vancouver Sun, the integration of print and online has far outweighed any benefits of sustaining two specific (if excellent and passionate) production teams. One plus one equals more than two.
The journalism is developed without silos and with the next needed platform in mind. Each culture helps the other.
And in newsrooms with unions and collective agreements, it&#039;s necessary to train and provide opportunities for the incumbents. Like the craft itself, they have to be bridged to digital media, and an integrated newsroom best effects this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our experience here at The Vancouver Sun, the integration of print and online has far outweighed any benefits of sustaining two specific (if excellent and passionate) production teams. One plus one equals more than two.<br />
The journalism is developed without silos and with the next needed platform in mind. Each culture helps the other.<br />
And in newsrooms with unions and collective agreements, it&#8217;s necessary to train and provide opportunities for the incumbents. Like the craft itself, they have to be bridged to digital media, and an integrated newsroom best effects this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/01/the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-keeping-web-and-print-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=850#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>I agree that merger talk does cover a lot of ground (or should). I also agree that you do have to judge the benefits and drawbacks of any arrangement. My original comment was motivated by the fact that the initial post on this topic did *neither* of those things. It didn&#039;t say a word about culture, and it didn&#039;t judge any of WPNI&#039;s accomplishments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that merger talk does cover a lot of ground (or should). I also agree that you do have to judge the benefits and drawbacks of any arrangement. My original comment was motivated by the fact that the initial post on this topic did *neither* of those things. It didn&#8217;t say a word about culture, and it didn&#8217;t judge any of WPNI&#8217;s accomplishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

