Times Open: New assumptions for newspapers and their audience

By Zachary M. SewardFeb. 24, 2009  /  11:51 a.m.  

Times Open, the conference for software developers hosted by The New York Times on Friday, suspended the typical gloom about the future of newspapers in favor of a mandate best captured by the keynote speaker, web entrepreneur Tim O’Reilly. “If there’s some feature you want” on NYTimes.com, he said, “don’t wait for the Times to do it. Hack it.” On the laptops perched atop nearly everyone’s knees, the hacks were already underway: new ways to search the paper, visualizations of political covearge, the real estate section plotted on a map. It was The People’s New York Times.

Nobody would have predicted this scene in 1995, amid the heyday of the newspaper business, but the person it might have surprised most would have been the Times’ new publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. In May of that year, he attended a very different kind of conference, hosted by the Nieman Foundation, on “Public Interest Journalism: Winner or Loser in the On-Line Era?” Mmhm, “On-Line.” The transcript of that event, dug up by Nieman’s Stefanie Friedhoff and highlighted by my boss Josh Benton in a talk last year, is a fascinating artifact. Sulzberger, chatting with Esther Dyson, reacts to one of her questions with an incredulous response: “Are you making the assumption that we’re going to put all of our reporters online?”

The assumptions at Times Open included: “when users innovate, support their behavior in your platform” (O’Reilly); data and interaction are as important to journalism as the story (Jacob Harris, Times developer); and “the goal is still widest distribution of our content” (Marc Frons, chief technology officer). Janet Robinson, the Times Co.’s CEO, made an even bolder assumption when she said her 158-year-old newspaper would “use every communications vehicle possible for the next 158 years.” She was later seen taking notes on O’Reilly’s speech.

The Times web guys (all guys) who ran the show on Friday spent much of their time touting and explaining the APIs they’ve been releasing since October. In the biggest news to emerge from the conference, Andrzej Lawn and Michael Donohoe previewed the Times Newswire API, scheduled for release this week, which will provide an “up-to-the-actual-second” feed of the entire newspaper’s content.

Developers in the audience were generally impressed by the flexibility of the APIs, which support faceted searches for filtering Times content by people, locations, subjects, sections, and more. NYT Explorer, created by Taylor Barstow, is an excellent example of that ability. It also speaks to a broader potential: NYTimes.com has a weak search functionality, but just 16 days after the necessary API was released, the audience built a superior solution. Just think what might emerge after 16 weeks.

There was disappointment that API “calls,” or requests, are limited by the Times to 5,000 per day, which will preclude heavily interactive applications. That could relate to what Frons, the CTO, acknowledged at the end of the day when I asked him about their plans to sell licenses for commercial use of the APIs. “We are working on language now,” he said, putting the timeframe between two and three weeks.

Other attendees have already posted their own Times Open wrap-ups, focusing on O’Reilly’s speech (including slides), future plans for the article search API, other news applications, audience engagement with the Times, the conference’s backchannel conversation, and an interview with Derek Gottfrid, the Times’ senior software architect. Diehards can review all of the action on Twitter or just peruse my tweets from the event. And there are plenty of photos on Flickr, including one of your correspondent attempting a “double-fisted blog interview.” (I did it for science.)

Later today and this week, I’ll be posting some interviews and tidbits I collected at Times Open, with the hope of applying some of these insights and innovations to the broader news business beyond The New York Times.

Photo at top by Nerd Merit Badges on TwitPic. Photo of Tim O’Reilly by Times Open on Flickr. Photo of crowd by Erin Sparling on Flickr under a Creative Commons license.

This entry was written by Zachary M. Seward, posted on February 24, 2009 at 11:51 am, and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback.


8 comments:

Trackbacks:

  1. A business model for the Times Company: Syndicate your platform » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism at 1:34 pm, February 24, 2009

    [...] all the excitement of Times Open, I had a hard time figuring out what it could mean for the newspaper business beyond The New York [...]

     
  2. Who Says I’m An Authority? | The Noisy Channel at 4:24 pm, February 27, 2009

    [...] Nieman Journalism Lab (280) [...]

     
  3. The first sketches of history » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism at 10:24 am, March 2, 2009

    [...] met Schwartz earlier this month at Times Open, the newspaper’s conference for developers. He was interested in the Times’ newly [...]

     
  4. Journalists, you’re not working for a mass medium anymore « Save the Media at 12:19 pm, March 7, 2009

    [...] several banded together – create a Web interaction application or tool that people love. ( I know The New York Times is trying to do just that with its Times Open, which is a good start.) Just for fun, here’s a list of crazy ideas that made millions, including the pet rock and [...]

     
  5. The Lab gets a facelift; rumors of future liposuction still unconfirmed » Nieman Journalism Lab at 3:31 am, March 17, 2009

    [...] On the right side of those story pages, underneath the sidebar, you’ll see links to a few related posts from our [...]

     
  6. How a CNN user propelled the network into Twitter’s top slot — or why CNN headlines are so short » Nieman Journalism Lab at 3:57 pm, April 16, 2009

    [...] the occasion for our meeting was Times Open, a software conference at The New York Times that I covered. My interview with Cox was photographed by John Young, who was amused by my admittedly excessive [...]

     
  7.   links for 2009-04-17 — contentious.com at 6:20 pm, April 17, 2009

    [...] Times Open: New assumptions for newspapers and their audience » Nieman Journalism Lab Nobody would have predicted this scene in 1995, amid the heyday of the newspaper business, but the person it might have surprised most would have been the Times’ new publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. Sulzberger, chatting with Esther Dyson, reacts to one of her questions with an incredulous response: “Are you making the assumption that we’re going to put all of our reporters online?” [...]

     
  8. Times Open Recap by Nieman Journalism Lab « Predicate, LLC | Editorial + Content Strategy at 8:23 am, November 21, 2009

    [...] via Times Open recap by Nieman Journalism Lab [...]

     

Leave a comment

Check out these related posts