Do you have “links to nowhere”?
A quick thought that can’t fit into 140 characters, but isn’t quite a full blog post: Just because your online news story has words with blue underlines, that doesn’t mean you’re linking.
I was reminded of this by my local paper’s online edition which — at least a little unintentional irony — today features a story on how journalism students are learning the new digital tools of the trade. Amid a sea of robolinks — automatically generated links to so-called Topic Pages (SEO-bait, really) — I noticed this:
Of course they’re not really tracking John Harris editor of the excellent Politico. The Chicago-centric publishing system used by The Sun is tracking John Harris, former chief-of-staff for former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. It’s a seemingly small error, but when more relevant terms in the article aren’t linked, it chips subtly but surely away at credibility with readers, especially digital natives, conversant in the language of linking.
Local newspapers can’t automate their way to success. Linking matters, and it takes humans.
That’s the problem with robo-linking (there are so many sites where, for instance, a company name is links to a tag that gives you further stories from the same site about the company, assuming you know who they are and that’s what you want) and in some cases humble blogs are much better, because the person who writes is the same one who links. And if something gets messed up — can fix it, pronto…
Took me a minute to get why the Baltimore Sun would be Chicago-centric. Then I remembered the Tribune parent company is still around and apparently still has a sense of humor on April Fools’ Day: http://www.tribune.com/