HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Where you get your news depends on where you stand on the issues
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 12, 2009, 9:36 a.m.

L.A. Times should shut off its presses, Politico should network, and other advice from Jeff Jarvis

What would Jeff Jarvis do? On Monday night, I asked the CUNY journalism professor and new-media evangelist how he would advise various news organizations that are struggling with old business models or experimenting with new ones. It was a rapid-fire exercise, and Jarvis, sporting a What Would Google Do? pin on his lapel, gamely offered his best elevator pitch for each company.

We discussed The Los Angeles Times, Politico, Gawker Media, Talking Points Memo, GlobalPost, The New York Times’ new local blogs, and ProPublica. Watch the video above for Jarvis’ advice, and a full transcript is after the jump.

Q: If you were advising the L.A. Times, what would you advise they do going forward right now?

Jeff Jarvis: I think concentrating on local, local, local, which they’re doing. Number one. And number two, create networks where they can’t do it all themselves and become more collaborative.

Q: Go web-only? Now or—

Jarvis: I think so. Somebody is going to, and we have to learn. So if the L.A. Times can do it, it would show the way for most everybody. And I think the L.A. Times could succeed at it in California, and that would be an important ray of sunshine and hope for the whole rest of the journalism business.

Q: If you’re Politico, making money some months, making money not other months, paying a lot of money for the journalists?

Jarvis: Yeah, again, I think Politico is kind of already a network and could become a network of top bloggers. I’m surprised that The Washington Post or Politico or The Guardian, for my work, or the Times hasn’t tied together the best political bloggers in networks. And I mean quality. But then sell against that and take a piece of all that and support that, so you don’t have to do everything with your own staff. It’s a more scalable method, I think.

Q: What would that look like, a network like that?

Jarvis: I think it would look like going to — I’m trying to think of — just Blogger A is brought to you with the advertising sale of Politico here. Politico is supporting their content. That blogger is, in turn, promoting Politico. It’s the Glam model brought to serious journalism.

Q: OK. And if you’re Gawker Media and Nick Denton, have you trimmed back far enough to get through the recession?

Jarvis: Yeah, I mean Nick loves to wear the hairshirt and act as if the world is falling down, but I think Nick’s doing very well, and he just is constantly adjusting and trying new models and finding the revenue to do things. His original goal was never to create a huge number of sites. He wanted to be the Condé Nast of online, the Si Newhouse of online. He has a few fewer than that, but Si’s culling magazines, too.

Q: So, Talking Points Memo, making money but not rolling in it. If you’re someone who wants to try to recreate the TPM model, is it possible?

Jarvis: Yeah, I think so. I think it’s possible against other niches. So TechCrunch covers tech, PaidContent covers the content business, and so on and so on. It’s all about grabbing your niche. The Internet does make a level playing field, and the way to stand out is by specializing and doing things really well.

Q: Does GlobalPost have a chance?

Jarvis: I think it does. But the way it’s gonna have a chance is if other news organizations hire GlobalPost journalists and help support them in place. GlobalPost alone can’t afford all these journalists, but the industry can, and if the industry trusts GlobalPost to find the best people, curate the best people, then I think there’s a chance that a good number of them could make a living.

Q: And you have an interest in this, but the Times’ The Local?

Jarvis: Yeah, I’m conflicted all up and down, but my students are going to work on The Local at the Times. I think what’s important about that is it’s The New York Times, of all places, trying to create a platform to help others than the Times’ journalists do journalism. I think that’s important.

Q: Sure, but for making money off of it? ‘Cause the Times isn’t—

Jarvis: I’m also bringing in a business student from Baruch to help try to figure out business models. We’ll see.

Q: All right, just figuring it out?

Jarvis: Yeah.

Q: OK, fair enough. And finally, the oddball out is ProPublica.

Jarvis: I think ProPublica and foundation support is a slice of a new pie. They can’t support all the big newspapers, they can’t support all of journalism, but they can contribute journalism. So the fact that ProPublica has had more than one story in The New York Times is a way that ProPublica is, in essence, subsidizing The New York Times. And that’s a good thing.

Q: All right. Thanks, Jeff.

Jarvis: Thanks.

POSTED     March 12, 2009, 9:36 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Where you get your news depends on where you stand on the issues
A new study by the Pew Research Center examines how Americans’ news consumption habits correlate with where they fall on the political spectrum.
Light everywhere: The California Civic Data Coalition wants to make public datasets easier to crunch
Journalists from rival outlets are pursuing the dream of “pluggable data,” partnering to build open-source tools to analyze California campaign finance and lobbying data.
Ebola Deeply builds on the lessons of single-subject news sites: A news operation with an expiration date
Following the blueprint of Syria Deeply, the new Ebola-focused site hopes to deliver context and coherence in covering the spread and treatment of the virus.
What to read next
1020
tweets
The newsonomics of the millennial moment
The new wave of news startups is aiming at a younger audience. But do legacy media companies have a chance at earning their attention?
803A mixed bag on apps: What The New York Times learned with NYT Opinion and NYT Now
The two apps were part of the paper’s plan to increase digital subscribers through smaller, targeted offerings. Now, with staff cutbacks on the way, one app is being shuttered and the other is being adjusted.
537Watching what happens: The New York Times is making a front-page bet on real-time aggregation
A new homepage feature called “Watching” offers readers a feed of headlines, tweets, and multimedia from around the web.
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Futurity
Craigslist
Newser
Salon
ReadWrite
Examiner.com
Investigative Reporting Workshop
La Nación
Drudge Report
American Independent News Network
PBS NewsHour
News Corp