<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marci Alboher on navigating a disrupted journalism career</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/03/marci-alboher-on-navigating-a-disrupted-journalism-career/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/03/marci-alboher-on-navigating-a-disrupted-journalism-career/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:31:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/03/marci-alboher-on-navigating-a-disrupted-journalism-career/comment-page-1/#comment-12558</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3440#comment-12558</guid>
		<description>As a young journalist plying his trade in college, I just wanted to thank both of you for this wonderful resource! It will be interesting to see if, and probably how, the lines are going to blur with respect to &quot;doers&quot; and &quot;writers.&quot; 

I think that also partially explains why so many young journalists like myself are pursuing further education through graduate school. Since so many educated &quot;slashes&quot; with advanced degrees are writing, such as Paul Krugman or Atul Gawande or Michael Pollan, it seems like writing ability is no longer enough anymore. Today&#039;s generation of journalists need more than ever the ability to think critically and grasp complicated topics. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a young journalist plying his trade in college, I just wanted to thank both of you for this wonderful resource! It will be interesting to see if, and probably how, the lines are going to blur with respect to &#8220;doers&#8221; and &#8220;writers.&#8221; </p>
<p>I think that also partially explains why so many young journalists like myself are pursuing further education through graduate school. Since so many educated &#8220;slashes&#8221; with advanced degrees are writing, such as Paul Krugman or Atul Gawande or Michael Pollan, it seems like writing ability is no longer enough anymore. Today&#8217;s generation of journalists need more than ever the ability to think critically and grasp complicated topics. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marci alboher</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/03/marci-alboher-on-navigating-a-disrupted-journalism-career/comment-page-1/#comment-10826</link>
		<dc:creator>marci alboher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3440#comment-10826</guid>
		<description>Josh, Thanks for a great interview. This is the trouble with speaking totally off the cuff. As I just read and watched that I realized that I left out a really big point on the issue of journalists writing about their areas of expertise. Transparency and disclosure can cure a lot of questions of conflict -- so I wish I hadn&#039;t taken such a hard line on that hypothetical about that former journalist who wanted to write about issues happening at his new organization. 

You&#039;re right -- he is ideally situated on those issues and it would be a shame not to do that at all. He can certainly write Op-eds or other opinion pieces where he can disclose his affiliations. There are probably other instances in which he (or others in similar situations) could write other pieces -- even more straight reporting -- as long as proper disclosures are made. On the panel what we were saying is that he&#039;d have an easier time of it if he wrote on other subjects.

I fully agree with you -- organizations and journalists themselves are going to have to get a lot more open about the different roles journalists will be playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, Thanks for a great interview. This is the trouble with speaking totally off the cuff. As I just read and watched that I realized that I left out a really big point on the issue of journalists writing about their areas of expertise. Transparency and disclosure can cure a lot of questions of conflict &#8212; so I wish I hadn&#8217;t taken such a hard line on that hypothetical about that former journalist who wanted to write about issues happening at his new organization. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8212; he is ideally situated on those issues and it would be a shame not to do that at all. He can certainly write Op-eds or other opinion pieces where he can disclose his affiliations. There are probably other instances in which he (or others in similar situations) could write other pieces &#8212; even more straight reporting &#8212; as long as proper disclosures are made. On the panel what we were saying is that he&#8217;d have an easier time of it if he wrote on other subjects.</p>
<p>I fully agree with you &#8212; organizations and journalists themselves are going to have to get a lot more open about the different roles journalists will be playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
