http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/22-of-pulitzer-entries-had-online-content-including-7-winners/ A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/22-of-pulitzer-entries-had-online-content-including-7-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-271516 Another online milestone for the Pulitzer Prize » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:14:54 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4346#comment-271516 [...] In the journalism categories, of the 1,097 total entries, about 100 came from online-only outlets, according to Pulitzer officials. Those entries came from 60 different news organizations. That’s a healthy growth curve, considering that in 2009, the first year online entries were welcomed, 37 organizations submitted 65 entries. [...] [...] In the journalism categories, of the 1,097 total entries, about 100 came from online-only outlets, according to Pulitzer officials. Those entries came from 60 different news organizations. That’s a healthy growth curve, considering that in 2009, the first year online entries were welcomed, 37 organizations submitted 65 entries. [...]

]]> http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/22-of-pulitzer-entries-had-online-content-including-7-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-13162 Juris Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:39:57 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4346#comment-13162 What the Pulitzers did not appear ready to consider seriously are online-only submissions. Of course we don't know how many such entries there were, but Gissler's comment referring to submissions having "online content" don't speak to the issue of online-only sources. FiveThirtyEight.com was identified as a "Notable Narrative" by Nieman last year but apparently was not notable enough to capture serious attention by Pulitzer. When will the Huffington Post, Politico, TPM and other online-only journalists get full consideration? What the Pulitzers did not appear ready to consider seriously are online-only submissions. Of course we don’t know how many such entries there were, but Gissler’s comment referring to submissions having “online content” don’t speak to the issue of online-only sources. FiveThirtyEight.com was identified as a “Notable Narrative” by Nieman last year but apparently was not notable enough to capture serious attention by Pulitzer. When will the Huffington Post, Politico, TPM and other online-only journalists get full consideration?

]]> http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/22-of-pulitzer-entries-had-online-content-including-7-winners/comment-page-1/#comment-13119 Bob Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:31:40 +0000 http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4346#comment-13119 22% ?! Big honking whooptie :-) A well researched and presented story is a well researched and presented story... what has the story being online (or not) got to do with it? 22% ?! Big honking whooptie :-)
A well researched and presented story is a well researched and presented story… what has the story being online (or not) got to do with it?

]]>