<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget bad journalism. The LAT front page ad is bad advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget bad journalism &#124; Business Advertising Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-15553</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget bad journalism &#124; Business Advertising Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3894#comment-15553</guid>
		<description>[...] in all the rhetoric, all the concern about this or that - think in terms of what your reader wants.more    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in all the rhetoric, all the concern about this or that &#8211; think in terms of what your reader wants.more    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carr: The reckoning is at hand for free content &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-12328</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carr: The reckoning is at hand for free content &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3894#comment-12328</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage and discussion of the Los Angeles Times&#8217; front-page fake news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage and discussion of the Los Angeles Times&#8217; front-page fake news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-12063</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3894#comment-12063</guid>
		<description>With due respect, I disagree with your analysis. The underlying premise highlights what really ails the industry. The idea that readers cannot tell the difference between the ad copy and the editorial content next to it assumes the reader is stupid, a mindset far too prevalent in newsrooms across the country. &quot;Only editors know what&#039;s newsworthy,&quot; has been the mantra for more than a century. The Internet has proven that point-of-view to be, at the least inaccurate and, at worst, totally false. Anyone doing a Google search knows the difference between the paid ads and the natural search results. The reader decides for themselves what&#039;s relevant to them, utilizing all, some or none of what they find. 

Why can&#039;t it be the same in print? Advertisers are fleeing newspapers, in part, because advertising content is increasingly less effective in persuading readers to become potential customers.  If ad content looked more like news content, rather than less, (better organized, logical, with a real story to tell) readers would be far more likely to utilize it to make their purchasing decisions. The newspaper would become a unique and valuable advertising tool, rather than a dying relic. Say it can&#039;t work? Check out the Wall Street Journal most days and you&#039;ll find a two, three or four-page spread of advertising content that looks just like the rest of the Journal&#039;s editorial copy. It&#039;s effective advertising and takes nothing away from the integrity of the news. 

Editors and reporters are always on their guard to insure the business aspects of a newspaper do not interfere with the newsroom&#039;s ability to report objectively. Maybe it&#039;s time for the business side to invoke the same iron-clad barrier in reverse. To survive, newspapers must adopt a new mantra: &quot;it&#039;s the advertising, stupid.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With due respect, I disagree with your analysis. The underlying premise highlights what really ails the industry. The idea that readers cannot tell the difference between the ad copy and the editorial content next to it assumes the reader is stupid, a mindset far too prevalent in newsrooms across the country. &#8220;Only editors know what&#8217;s newsworthy,&#8221; has been the mantra for more than a century. The Internet has proven that point-of-view to be, at the least inaccurate and, at worst, totally false. Anyone doing a Google search knows the difference between the paid ads and the natural search results. The reader decides for themselves what&#8217;s relevant to them, utilizing all, some or none of what they find. </p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t it be the same in print? Advertisers are fleeing newspapers, in part, because advertising content is increasingly less effective in persuading readers to become potential customers.  If ad content looked more like news content, rather than less, (better organized, logical, with a real story to tell) readers would be far more likely to utilize it to make their purchasing decisions. The newspaper would become a unique and valuable advertising tool, rather than a dying relic. Say it can&#8217;t work? Check out the Wall Street Journal most days and you&#8217;ll find a two, three or four-page spread of advertising content that looks just like the rest of the Journal&#8217;s editorial copy. It&#8217;s effective advertising and takes nothing away from the integrity of the news. </p>
<p>Editors and reporters are always on their guard to insure the business aspects of a newspaper do not interfere with the newsroom&#8217;s ability to report objectively. Maybe it&#8217;s time for the business side to invoke the same iron-clad barrier in reverse. To survive, newspapers must adopt a new mantra: &#8220;it&#8217;s the advertising, stupid.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/forget-bad-journalism-the-lat-front-page-ad-is-bad-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=3894#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>Now, a days every thing in the world is a big part for every human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, a days every thing in the world is a big part for every human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

