<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is that the defunct New York Sun peeking over the digital horizon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The once-defunct New York Sun is slowly rising » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-54106</link>
		<dc:creator>The once-defunct New York Sun is slowly rising » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4493#comment-54106</guid>
		<description>[...] first wrote about the Sun peeking over the horizon in April, when society columnist Amanda Gordon (no relation to Peter) returned to covering benefits [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first wrote about the Sun peeking over the horizon in April, when society columnist Amanda Gordon (no relation to Peter) returned to covering benefits [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bag it, Tag it: A post-mortem for the New York Sun &#171; Inverted Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-16590</link>
		<dc:creator>Bag it, Tag it: A post-mortem for the New York Sun &#171; Inverted Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4493#comment-16590</guid>
		<description>[...] today I came across this bit of info from the Nieman J Lab web site (see how deliciously circular these posts are?) a few weeks ago talking about how the New York Sun [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today I came across this bit of info from the Nieman J Lab web site (see how deliciously circular these posts are?) a few weeks ago talking about how the New York Sun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Dima</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-13679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Dima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4493#comment-13679</guid>
		<description>Very nicely reported, Mr. Seward. Thanks for explaining what is going on over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nicely reported, Mr. Seward. Thanks for explaining what is going on over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/is-that-the-defunct-new-york-sun-peeking-over-the-digital-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-13664</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4493#comment-13664</guid>
		<description>Ah, isn&#039;t that cute.  Seth is playing coy.  That editorial &quot;Sound Familiar&quot; DOES &quot;Sound Familiar&quot;.  Same use of the royal &quot;We&quot;, same quoting from previously written piece by same author, same Lipskyesque turn of the hackneyed phrase (would haves or could haves).  Seth is &#039;abubblin&#039; back, and by our lights, boy, that&#039;s nifty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, isn&#8217;t that cute.  Seth is playing coy.  That editorial &#8220;Sound Familiar&#8221; DOES &#8220;Sound Familiar&#8221;.  Same use of the royal &#8220;We&#8221;, same quoting from previously written piece by same author, same Lipskyesque turn of the hackneyed phrase (would haves or could haves).  Seth is &#8216;abubblin&#8217; back, and by our lights, boy, that&#8217;s nifty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

