Nieman Foundation at Harvard
The Texas Tribune updates its premium political coverage for an email newsletter world
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 16, 2009, 1:49 p.m.

Mine. Er, Yours. Or Some Guy’s.

A brief update on Mine, the Time Inc. magazine customization effort I wrote about yesterday where you pick the mags whose old articles you’d like repackaged into a custom advertising vehicle for Lexus.

In the comments of that post, a woman named lindadcb writes:

I received a copy of “Mine” and it did not contain the titles I selected – so it’s not really ‘mine’?

I was confused by the entire thing

Perhaps she errantly received a copy of That Guy Down the Street’s? But seriously, it does appear there were some problems with Time Inc.’s customization engine. Our own Zach Seward got his copy in the mail yesterday and got this email a few hours later:

So apparently some Mine readers are getting apologies that Time Inc. screwed up their customization. (Actually, Zach reports, they got his magazine choices right. He picked the same ones that I did, except subbing in Time for InStyle. And his Lexus ad promoted the vehicle’s usefulness in transporting luggage, not “vintage wine,” as mine did. I guess Time readers don’t drink wine. Or something.)

Does the mention of a new sixth issue of Mine mean this will have a life beyond just being a Lexus promotional trial?

POSTED     April 16, 2009, 1:49 p.m.
Show comments  
Show tags
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The Texas Tribune updates its premium political coverage for an email newsletter world
Goodbye, Texas Weekly. Hello, The Blast.
The Information’s Jessica Lessin on how she’s scaling an already-expensive subscription product
Going both upmarket to investors ($10,000 a year) and downmarket to students ($234 a year).
Bustle’s open-sourcing a way for news orgs to port content to AMP, Instant Articles, and Apple News
“We thought the right way to approach it was to share it as an open project so the whole industry can move forward building on something like this rather than people halfway solving the problem individually.”