<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle DX won&#8217;t save the news industry, but that&#8217;s not the point: a guide to our coverage of e-readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No news on Nook&#8217;s newspapers » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-45096</link>
		<dc:creator>No news on Nook&#8217;s newspapers » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-45096</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been skeptical of the impact of Kindles and Kindle-like devices on newspaper business models. And I think that&#8217;s been borne out — we learned earlier this week that The Los Angeles Times has only 2,700 Kindle subscribers, which produces roughly the revenue required to pay for one reporter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been skeptical of the impact of Kindles and Kindle-like devices on newspaper business models. And I think that&#8217;s been borne out — we learned earlier this week that The Los Angeles Times has only 2,700 Kindle subscribers, which produces roughly the revenue required to pay for one reporter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelJ</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14914</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14914</guid>
		<description>Paschal,
They might also warm to spending $24.95 for a beautifully illustrated art book with links to the computer experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paschal,<br />
They might also warm to spending $24.95 for a beautifully illustrated art book with links to the computer experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paschal Fowlkes</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14908</link>
		<dc:creator>Paschal Fowlkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14908</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree that the Kindle DX—or any e-reader—is unlikely to be the solution to the industry&#039;s woes. But I do think there will be unintended consequences. Namely that, when faced with the prospect of shelling out not-insignificant sums for static black-and-white content on another $500 device, consumers might warm to the idea of paying for vivid, highly functional online content experiences—conveniently available on their existing computer. For more: http://tinyurl.com/pvea97</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree that the Kindle DX—or any e-reader—is unlikely to be the solution to the industry&#8217;s woes. But I do think there will be unintended consequences. Namely that, when faced with the prospect of shelling out not-insignificant sums for static black-and-white content on another $500 device, consumers might warm to the idea of paying for vivid, highly functional online content experiences—conveniently available on their existing computer. For more: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/pvea97" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/pvea97</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudolph</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14518</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14518</guid>
		<description>Steve Bezos hits the nail on the head in a letter to customers introducing the bigger Kindle on the front page of the Amazon Web site. This is why the e-reader is the future of newspapers, not Web sites and not smart phones. It&#039;s about READING, not interactivity. 


Dear customers,
A strange thing happened on the way to the paperless society. We humans created more paper than ever before. Computer printers (and their evil companion, the ink-toner cartridge) have proliferated, and most of us routinely prinnt out and lug around loads of personal and professional documents. Why? It’s not that buying printers or changing ink-toner cartridges is fun. It’s because reading on paper is better than reading on traditional computer displays. Printing has been worth the hassle.
Kindle starts to change that. People who see Kindle’s display for the first time do a double-take. It looks and reads like real paper.

Also, AT&amp;T exec high on e-reader futures. See link below.

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/how-the-next-kindle-actually-could-save-the-newspaper-business/2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Bezos hits the nail on the head in a letter to customers introducing the bigger Kindle on the front page of the Amazon Web site. This is why the e-reader is the future of newspapers, not Web sites and not smart phones. It&#8217;s about READING, not interactivity. </p>
<p>Dear customers,<br />
A strange thing happened on the way to the paperless society. We humans created more paper than ever before. Computer printers (and their evil companion, the ink-toner cartridge) have proliferated, and most of us routinely prinnt out and lug around loads of personal and professional documents. Why? It’s not that buying printers or changing ink-toner cartridges is fun. It’s because reading on paper is better than reading on traditional computer displays. Printing has been worth the hassle.<br />
Kindle starts to change that. People who see Kindle’s display for the first time do a double-take. It looks and reads like real paper.</p>
<p>Also, AT&amp;T exec high on e-reader futures. See link below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/how-the-next-kindle-actually-could-save-the-newspaper-business/2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/how-the-next-kindle-actually-could-save-the-newspaper-business/2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Langeveld, do Nieman Jounalism Lab, fala sobre o futuro do The Boston Globe &#124; Converge Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14443</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Langeveld, do Nieman Jounalism Lab, fala sobre o futuro do The Boston Globe &#124; Converge Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14443</guid>
		<description>[...] around a battleship in a bathtub.  But perhaps it is indicative that the Globe was mentioned at today’s announcement of the supersized Kindle among papers that would offer discounts on the device as part of a longer-term subscription.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around a battleship in a bathtub.  But perhaps it is indicative that the Globe was mentioned at today’s announcement of the supersized Kindle among papers that would offer discounts on the device as part of a longer-term subscription.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boston Globe drama: What&#8217;s next? &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14420</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boston Globe drama: What&#8217;s next? &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14420</guid>
		<description>[...] around a battleship in a bathtub.  But perhaps it is indicative that the Globe was mentioned at today&#8217;s announcement of the supersized Kindle among papers that would offer discounts on the device as part of a longer-term subscription.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around a battleship in a bathtub.  But perhaps it is indicative that the Globe was mentioned at today&#8217;s announcement of the supersized Kindle among papers that would offer discounts on the device as part of a longer-term subscription.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shared Items - May 6, 2009 &#124; Einar Thorsen</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14384</link>
		<dc:creator>Shared Items - May 6, 2009 &#124; Einar Thorsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14384</guid>
		<description>[...] The Kindle DX won’t save the news industry, but that’s not the point: a guide to our coverage of... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Kindle DX won’t save the news industry, but that’s not the point: a guide to our coverage of&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/05/the-kindle-dx-wont-save-the-news-industry-but-thats-not-the-point-a-guide-to-our-coverage-of-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-14374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=4592#comment-14374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more than willing to pay for content and even more willing to pay for content that is advertising-free, but I would like to see Amazon better define ownership rights that come with Kindle media purchases. Moreover, I don&#039;t see how this makes sense for someone who reads one or two daily newspapers and subscribes to a couple magazines. The break even point on the Kindle compared to print subscriptions is over two years, by which point the Kindle you bought will be obsolete and its extended warranty expired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more than willing to pay for content and even more willing to pay for content that is advertising-free, but I would like to see Amazon better define ownership rights that come with Kindle media purchases. Moreover, I don&#8217;t see how this makes sense for someone who reads one or two daily newspapers and subscribes to a couple magazines. The break even point on the Kindle compared to print subscriptions is over two years, by which point the Kindle you bought will be obsolete and its extended warranty expired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

