<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four reasons neighborhood papers might be the (or a) future of editing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/four-reasons-neighborhood-papers-might-be-the-or-a-future-of-editing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/four-reasons-neighborhood-papers-might-be-the-or-a-future-of-editing/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/four-reasons-neighborhood-papers-might-be-the-or-a-future-of-editing/comment-page-1/#comment-30989</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=7126#comment-30989</guid>
		<description>I wish Swart much luck and success. Having spent the past four years caring for and feeding a similar but strictly online news venture, I understand his ambitions - I think.

But some caveats: 

Sometimes the citizen-journalists are in it as surreptitious campaign operatives or otherwise hide an unfortunate agenda. If they&#039;re clever, you don&#039;t find out until later.

Amatuer journalists can require a lot of hand holding. There are only so many hours in a day.

You need as many of those hours as possible to devote to the pursuit of selling advertising, unless you have some other revenue model. Better would be a partner with kick-butt sales skills. Other area publications are likely to view you as competition. As such, they probably aren&#039;t going to be very interested in syndicating content from you.

For the sake of longevity, focus on the revenue model. And on a financial partner. To reach an audience, they have to know you are there. This means marketing of some kind.

Work hard, but work smart, too. Again, all the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Swart much luck and success. Having spent the past four years caring for and feeding a similar but strictly online news venture, I understand his ambitions &#8211; I think.</p>
<p>But some caveats: </p>
<p>Sometimes the citizen-journalists are in it as surreptitious campaign operatives or otherwise hide an unfortunate agenda. If they&#8217;re clever, you don&#8217;t find out until later.</p>
<p>Amatuer journalists can require a lot of hand holding. There are only so many hours in a day.</p>
<p>You need as many of those hours as possible to devote to the pursuit of selling advertising, unless you have some other revenue model. Better would be a partner with kick-butt sales skills. Other area publications are likely to view you as competition. As such, they probably aren&#8217;t going to be very interested in syndicating content from you.</p>
<p>For the sake of longevity, focus on the revenue model. And on a financial partner. To reach an audience, they have to know you are there. This means marketing of some kind.</p>
<p>Work hard, but work smart, too. Again, all the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

