<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times pulls a post, but it lives on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes’ pulled post lives on &#124; DAILYMAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-33337</link>
		<dc:creator>Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes’ pulled post lives on &#124; DAILYMAIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-33337</guid>
		<description>[...] Full post at this link&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full post at this link&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-33146</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-33146</guid>
		<description>Good Lord, NYT—pay more attention to improving the paper and less to unmasking the person/people behind one critical blog. Reall, it&#039;s undignified!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Lord, NYT—pay more attention to improving the paper and less to unmasking the person/people behind one critical blog. Reall, it&#8217;s undignified!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mis-outed anonyblogger &#171; BaptistPlanet</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-33035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mis-outed anonyblogger &#171; BaptistPlanet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-33035</guid>
		<description>[...] the Jacksonville, Fla., sheriff&#8217;s department to do the job, it would most assuredly not have mis-outed the anonymous author (or authors) of the NYTPicker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Jacksonville, Fla., sheriff&#8217;s department to do the job, it would most assuredly not have mis-outed the anonymous author (or authors) of the NYTPicker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-33003</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-33003</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course, you can’t just make things on the Internet disappear.&quot;

Or can you? Mashable reported yesterday that Yoko Ono told the UK&#039;s Sky News that Apple would make the Beatle&#039;s catalog available on iTunes today. But the Sky News story disappeared.

&quot;Unfortunately, shortly after the leak appeared, Sky News was reportedly told to cut the story and now even the Google Cache of the original has gone missing. Conspiracy theorists (and Beatles fans) are out there having a field day with this one.&quot;

http://mashable.com/2009/09/08/beatles-itunes/

We&#039;ll know if the original report was right or wrong in a few hours. But the situation raises other questions about the permanence of news on the Internet. 

If a story turns out to be false, should it be removed or just corrected? If this story can disappear, what about others? And how does Google fit into this?`</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course, you can’t just make things on the Internet disappear.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or can you? Mashable reported yesterday that Yoko Ono told the UK&#8217;s Sky News that Apple would make the Beatle&#8217;s catalog available on iTunes today. But the Sky News story disappeared.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, shortly after the leak appeared, Sky News was reportedly told to cut the story and now even the Google Cache of the original has gone missing. Conspiracy theorists (and Beatles fans) are out there having a field day with this one.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/09/08/beatles-itunes/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2009/09/08/beatles-itunes/</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll know if the original report was right or wrong in a few hours. But the situation raises other questions about the permanence of news on the Internet. </p>
<p>If a story turns out to be false, should it be removed or just corrected? If this story can disappear, what about others? And how does Google fit into this?`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes&#8217; pulled post lives on &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-32935</link>
		<dc:creator>Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes&#8217; pulled post lives on &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-32935</guid>
		<description>[...] Full post at this link&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full post at this link&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYT uses anonymous source to expose anonymous blogger but gets it wrong &#124; Hypercrit</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/new-york-times-pulls-a-post-but-it-lives-on/comment-page-1/#comment-32842</link>
		<dc:creator>NYT uses anonymous source to expose anonymous blogger but gets it wrong &#124; Hypercrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=8284#comment-32842</guid>
		<description>[...] This evening, the New York Times pub­lished a post claim­ing that the anony­mous blog­ger behind the NYTPicker blog was actu­ally David Blum, for­mer edi­tor of the Village Voice and sev­eral other New York pub­li­ca­tions. The times cred­ited the infor­ma­tion to an anony­mous source, accord­ing to cov­er­age at Nieman Journalism Lab. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This evening, the New York Times pub­lished a post claim­ing that the anony­mous blog­ger behind the NYTPicker blog was actu­ally David Blum, for­mer edi­tor of the Village Voice and sev­eral other New York pub­li­ca­tions. The times cred­ited the infor­ma­tion to an anony­mous source, accord­ing to cov­er­age at Nieman Journalism Lab. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

