<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ProPublica fundraising adviser manages expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:13:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Watch&#8217;s revenue model: Charge news outlets, target donors » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-53752</link>
		<dc:creator>California Watch&#8217;s revenue model: Charge news outlets, target donors » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=9893#comment-53752</guid>
		<description>[...] standard nonprofit strategies to the digital age. Like his peers at ProPublica, Rosenthal hopes to pursue smaller donors, perhaps with a strategy built around communities organized on Facebook or Twitter. Rather than ask [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#f5f5dc;padding:20px; font-family:Georgia; font-style:italic; font-size:1.1em; margin-top:6px; margin-bottom:8px;">
<p>[...] standard nonprofit strategies to the digital age. Like his peers at ProPublica, Rosenthal hopes to pursue smaller donors, perhaps with a strategy built around communities organized on Facebook or Twitter. Rather than ask [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cohn</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-43128</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=9893#comment-43128</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the previous two comments. I run a nonprofit that fundraises for independent journalists. And I&#039;m talking about REAL independent journalists - folks that really NEED to raise money so they can keep reporting on topics. None of them, me included, make anywhere CLOSE to what the top brass at ProPublica make. Nor do they run organizations with as padded a budget.

I love ProPublica - but this represents a real disconnect for me.

I would disagree with Madeline that small donations or the atomization of content is a bad way to go. I think it is silly to think there is a quid pro quo thing going on with small donors to journalism. I love skepticism in my reporting - not in my online experiments.

People have a right to know where their money is going and organizations should be held accountable for where the money is going - which goes exactly to the point of the last two comments.

If they don&#039;t know where the money is going - they&#039;ll assume the worst - to pay for inflated salaries. Especially if we are talking about such a large organization.

I also love Knight Foundation (I have my obvious disclaimer of bias here) but I don&#039;t really understand giving ProPublic which has a budget of 10 million a year guaranteed for another three years an extra million dollars so they can hire a fundraiser who will try and make them even more millions. They couldn&#039;t find that spare million in their budget? I really want to see where this money is going.

End skeptical rant here.... I will go back to being a cheery, relatively bootstrapped entrepreneur now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the previous two comments. I run a nonprofit that fundraises for independent journalists. And I&#8217;m talking about REAL independent journalists &#8211; folks that really NEED to raise money so they can keep reporting on topics. None of them, me included, make anywhere CLOSE to what the top brass at ProPublica make. Nor do they run organizations with as padded a budget.</p>
<p>I love ProPublica &#8211; but this represents a real disconnect for me.</p>
<p>I would disagree with Madeline that small donations or the atomization of content is a bad way to go. I think it is silly to think there is a quid pro quo thing going on with small donors to journalism. I love skepticism in my reporting &#8211; not in my online experiments.</p>
<p>People have a right to know where their money is going and organizations should be held accountable for where the money is going &#8211; which goes exactly to the point of the last two comments.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t know where the money is going &#8211; they&#8217;ll assume the worst &#8211; to pay for inflated salaries. Especially if we are talking about such a large organization.</p>
<p>I also love Knight Foundation (I have my obvious disclaimer of bias here) but I don&#8217;t really understand giving ProPublic which has a budget of 10 million a year guaranteed for another three years an extra million dollars so they can hire a fundraiser who will try and make them even more millions. They couldn&#8217;t find that spare million in their budget? I really want to see where this money is going.</p>
<p>End skeptical rant here&#8230;. I will go back to being a cheery, relatively bootstrapped entrepreneur now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foster Kamer</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-43097</link>
		<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=9893#comment-43097</guid>
		<description>Even as a grassroots, penny-by-penny donating party: I would throw a tax-deductible $100 a year to ProPublica...if Paul Steiger weren&#039;t paid what he&#039;s getting. You can&#039;t work for a struggling nonprofit and make a little under half a mil. That&#039;s absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as a grassroots, penny-by-penny donating party: I would throw a tax-deductible $100 a year to ProPublica&#8230;if Paul Steiger weren&#8217;t paid what he&#8217;s getting. You can&#8217;t work for a struggling nonprofit and make a little under half a mil. That&#8217;s absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/propublica-fundraising-adviser-manages-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-43059</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=9893#comment-43059</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to be dunned for support to pay Paul Steiger&#039;s inflated salary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to be dunned for support to pay Paul Steiger&#8217;s inflated salary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
