Comments on: This Week in Review: Who’s responsible for local news, and Google plays hardball with China

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:13:00 +0000

Just a brief thanks for your articles and insights, I really look forward to and enjoy reading things here, its a very great source of detailed information thanks a lot!. Also a great source of info buy meladerm

By: This Week in Review: Who’s responsible for local news, and Google plays hardball with China | Mark Coddington

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:48:01 +0000

[...] review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab on Jan. 15, [...]

By: Chip Kaye

Chip Kaye — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:57:54 +0000

Just found “This Week in Review” – terrific idea. Aggregating TWiR on a single page w/call-out from home page would be very nice.

By: Notes for 1/17/2010 at MasterMaq's Blog

Notes for 1/17/2010 at MasterMaq's Blog — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:52:13 +0000

[...] Good recap from Nieman Journalism Lab: Who’s responsible for local news, and Google plays hardball with China. [...]

By: 第五天：google.cn“中国四大发明”logo意义解读 | 文通博客

第五天：google.cn“中国四大发明”logo意义解读 | 文通博客 — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:09:33 +0000

[...] Posted by 勇敢台灣人部落格 at 07:02 This Week in Review: Who’s responsible for local news, and Google … [...]

By: Lois

Lois — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:45:14 +0000

Way to go Mark!

By: Seth Lewis

Seth Lewis — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:51:08 +0000

Mark,

Thanks for the excellent curation (or is it aggregation?) on the “future of journalism” beat, as always. Glad to see you’re joining the Lab!

By: Brad

Brad — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:20:26 +0000

Great idea. Is there an RSS feed for This Week In Review posts? Thanks.

By: Steve Buttry

Steve Buttry — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:08:20 +0000

Thanks for noting my post about the Pew study. I should note a development that probably happened since Mark read my post: I have learned of a blogger in Baltimore who actively covered one of the six story lines studied by Pew. She posted six times about the sale of the Senator Theatre the week that Pew was studying how the Baltimore media ecosystem covered that story.

Since the study did not include her blog, this raises serious questions about the validity of the conclusions for that whole story line. And as one of only six story lines studies, that could seriously skew the statistics for the whole study. Here again is the link to my post (be sure to read the comment from the blogger in question):

http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/old-media-find-comfort-in-study-of-baltimore-media-they-didnt-look-very-close/