Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Sure, people like online video, but that doesn’t mean they want to watch your hard news videos
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Jan. 5, 2010, 10:30 a.m.

Two awards to know about: Worth Bingham and Grantham

January is awards entry season in newsrooms across the country — the time when copy machines burn through countless toner cartridges, churning out copies of that great story you wrote back in April, the one that got the mayor thrown in jail.

And since more journalists are facing financial difficulties these days, it’s worth appreciating the journalism awards that attach a goodly-sized chunk of money to the prestige that comes with winning. I want to let you know about two such prizes that have deadlines looming.

First is the Worth Bingham Prize for Investigative Journalism. This is a prize we administer here at the Nieman Foundation, named for the late reporter and member of the storied Bingham journalism family. You can read all about the prize here, but here’s the description:

The Worth Bingham Prize honors investigative reporting of stories of national significance where the public interest is being ill-served. These stories may involve state, local or national government, lobbyists or the press itself wherever there exists an “atmosphere of easy tolerance” that Worth Bingham himself once described in his reporting on the nation’s capital. The investigative reporting may cover actual violations of the law, rule or code; lax or ineffective administration or enforcement; or activities which create conflicts of interest, entail excessive secrecy or otherwise raise questions of propriety.

In other words, good old fashioned watchdog reporting. The winner of the Worth Bingham Prize will receive $20,000; past winners include Seymour Hersh, Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein, Dana Priest, Anne Hull, Diane Henriques, Bill Dedman and other great journalists. And this year, we’re accepting applications from online-only outlets as well.

The deadline is coming up quick, though: Entries must be postmarked by this Friday, January 8. So get cracking.

The other prize hasn’t been around as long as the Worth Bingham, but it has an even larger dollar amount attached. It’s the Grantham Prize for Excellence in Reporting on the Environment and, as you might surmise from the name, it honors the best environmental reporting of the year. And first place is $75,000. About the prize:

The purpose of the Prize is to encourage outstanding coverage of the environment, to recognize reporting that has the potential to bring about constructive change, and to broadly disseminate the Prize-winning story to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental and natural resource issues.

(Disclosure: I sit on the advisory board of the Metcalf Institute for Marine & Environmental Reporting at the University of Rhode Island, which administers the Grantham Prize.)

You’ve got a little more time to get that application ready: The deadline is February 1 (except for book-length entries, which are due sooner). Much more about the prize here.

POSTED     Jan. 5, 2010, 10:30 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Sure, people like online video, but that doesn’t mean they want to watch your hard news videos
“Even for brands associated with hard news…their top or second videos in terms of Facebook engagement numbers turned out to be animal videos.”
Newsonomics: The Financial Times’ CEO on trial subscriptions, the platform age, and living in luxury
“What you don’t want is the brands to disappear in some kind of homogenized platform. It’s not just that we don’t want it — I think readers don’t want it. They feel the degree of loyalty.”
Hot Pod: Is the BBC’s power to blame for the U.K. podcasting scene’s underdevelopment?
Plus: Shutting down a podcast after 11 years, Scripps tries out a new model, and Radiotopia picks its finalists.