<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET and Gizmodo are sharing content, and they don&#8217;t seem worried about a &#8220;duplicate penalty&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Stray</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-73841</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Stray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=12119#comment-73841</guid>
		<description>How about just giving the user a more complete experience on either site? I&#039;m only going to visit a few sites in a day; I&#039;d like those to give me as big a window as possible onto the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about just giving the user a more complete experience on either site? I&#8217;m only going to visit a few sites in a day; I&#8217;d like those to give me as big a window as possible onto the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-73595</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=12119#comment-73595</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that neither company wishes to clarify or verify what they are hoping to accomplish with this tactic. SEO may be the motive but my suspicions also lead in the direction of &quot;monetizing&quot; their sites with increased traffic. But this may backfire in the long run. I personally will stick with the &quot;traditional&quot; SEO standards that have been set forth and keep my content original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that neither company wishes to clarify or verify what they are hoping to accomplish with this tactic. SEO may be the motive but my suspicions also lead in the direction of &#8220;monetizing&#8221; their sites with increased traffic. But this may backfire in the long run. I personally will stick with the &#8220;traditional&#8221; SEO standards that have been set forth and keep my content original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

