<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Newsonomics of profit: Google&#8217;s and newspapers&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Newsonomics of reborn newspaper profit » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-108789</link>
		<dc:creator>The Newsonomics of reborn newspaper profit » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-108789</guid>
		<description>[...] the newsonomics are constrained. While Google is off buying a company a month and Apple charts its own strong growth path, most newspaper companies have little room to maneuver. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the newsonomics are constrained. While Google is off buying a company a month and Apple charts its own strong growth path, most newspaper companies have little room to maneuver. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News start-up Checklist &#171; Il Giornalaio</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-82581</link>
		<dc:creator>News start-up Checklist &#171; Il Giornalaio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-82581</guid>
		<description>[...] di tentativi di ridefinizione delle modalità di rendere la pubblicazione delle notizie nuovamente redditizio, mi è sembrato interessante riprenderne i suggerimenti, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] di tentativi di ridefinizione delle modalità di rendere la pubblicazione delle notizie nuovamente redditizio, mi è sembrato interessante riprenderne i suggerimenti, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Terenzio</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-81935</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Terenzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-81935</guid>
		<description>They will never &quot;match up&quot; and Google will never move towards the economics of a newspaper business.

But one thing to learn from Google&#039;s acquisitions is that there is still room for entrepreneurial innovation.

There lies potential, but that ability is a far cry from the culture and speed with which any traditional company I have ever seen is moving.

If I owned or ran a large media corporation, I would invest in startups or spawn new busineses completety separate from the existing businesses.

Hearst does so.

That is the only way to compete in this landscape. 

And let the traditional companies continue to try to compete. But I think the conflicts of interest are too great in many of them that by the time they are ready to really change, the market they sought after will have been filled by an up and coming that was willing to cut their throats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will never &#8220;match up&#8221; and Google will never move towards the economics of a newspaper business.</p>
<p>But one thing to learn from Google&#8217;s acquisitions is that there is still room for entrepreneurial innovation.</p>
<p>There lies potential, but that ability is a far cry from the culture and speed with which any traditional company I have ever seen is moving.</p>
<p>If I owned or ran a large media corporation, I would invest in startups or spawn new busineses completety separate from the existing businesses.</p>
<p>Hearst does so.</p>
<p>That is the only way to compete in this landscape. </p>
<p>And let the traditional companies continue to try to compete. But I think the conflicts of interest are too great in many of them that by the time they are ready to really change, the market they sought after will have been filled by an up and coming that was willing to cut their throats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-02-26 &#124; sammeddis.com</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-81812</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-02-26 &#124; sammeddis.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-81812</guid>
		<description>[...] The &#039;newsonomics of profit&#039; rhymes with Google. Newspapers left in the dust. &#039;As many have said, it’s a one-trick pony, but with the best trick found in the 21st century digital business. It knows that business is maturing, so we can see the theme in its company-a-month buying spree: mobile, social, video.&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#39;newsonomics of profit&#39; rhymes with Google. Newspapers left in the dust. &#39;As many have said, it’s a one-trick pony, but with the best trick found in the 21st century digital business. It knows that business is maturing, so we can see the theme in its company-a-month buying spree: mobile, social, video.&#39; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Foremski</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-81332</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Foremski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-81332</guid>
		<description>The Italian court case is interesting in that there is a possibility that Google wil be reclassified as a media company and have to moderate what it hosts and distributes. That will eat into its profits. Plus, if it is reclassified as a media compay, its stock market value will fall through the floor. No wonder it doesn&#039;t want the world to look at it as a media company but it is: it publishes pages of content with advertising around it. What&#039;s *not* being a media company about that?

It&#039;s not a technology company. You can&#039;t buy any technology from Google. It is a technology-enabled media company. 

The newspaper companies have to maintain large editorial teams but Google does not (at least not yet.) I think the economics of Gogle&#039;s business will move towards the economics of the newspaper business over the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Italian court case is interesting in that there is a possibility that Google wil be reclassified as a media company and have to moderate what it hosts and distributes. That will eat into its profits. Plus, if it is reclassified as a media compay, its stock market value will fall through the floor. No wonder it doesn&#8217;t want the world to look at it as a media company but it is: it publishes pages of content with advertising around it. What&#8217;s *not* being a media company about that?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a technology company. You can&#8217;t buy any technology from Google. It is a technology-enabled media company. </p>
<p>The newspaper companies have to maintain large editorial teams but Google does not (at least not yet.) I think the economics of Gogle&#8217;s business will move towards the economics of the newspaper business over the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Case Ernsting</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/the-newsonomics-of-profit-googles-and-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-81314</link>
		<dc:creator>Case Ernsting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=13085#comment-81314</guid>
		<description>Great post Ken. The numbers are staggering when you look at the way media is going. So many newspaper people claim there&#039;s no money on the internet...ha! I think they&#039;ll eventually figure out ways to make the money match up, but these growing pains are getting too harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ken. The numbers are staggering when you look at the way media is going. So many newspaper people claim there&#8217;s no money on the internet&#8230;ha! I think they&#8217;ll eventually figure out ways to make the money match up, but these growing pains are getting too harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

