Comments on: WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model

By: A Monumental Week for Online Content

A Monumental Week for Online Content — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:42:43 +0000

[...] in the rapidly changing online content arena. First, on Thursday, The Washington Post announced it would begin curating articles from state political bloggers based on user voting and staff [...]

By: SocraticGadfly

SocraticGadfly — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:16:02 +0000

People who write crap (as does most of the WaPost’s sycophantic, incestuous, inside-the-Beltway suck-up op-ed staff) to manage others? Oh, that’s rich.

By: 5 Ways to Monetize the Future of News Media | Organic Page One Search Engine Traffic

Thu, 27 May 2010 00:07:11 +0000

[...] Washington Post is pursuing a very similar strategy, where a small number of curators oversee a network of unpaid writers, but [...]

By: Launching a site? Five tips to get you off on the right foot » Nieman Journalism Lab

Wed, 26 May 2010 18:02:01 +0000

[...] sites. Other publications are in the midst of similar experiments with local bloggers, including The Washington Post and its not-yet-launched local rival [...]

By: 5 Ways to Monetize the Future of News Media

5 Ways to Monetize the Future of News Media — Tue, 25 May 2010 20:07:21 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Citizen journalism: un ossimoro o una definizione in codice di “contenuti gratis”? | LSDI

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:14:06 +0000

[...] Washington Post sta cercando di imparare da HuffPo, racconta il Nieman Journalism Lab (WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model). E altri quotidiani stanno abbracciando un approccio [...]

By: Huffington talks convergence, and “monetizeable free” » Nieman Journalism Lab

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:01:48 +0000

[...] wrote yesterday about The Washington Post taking a page from The Huffington Post in building blog networks on the content-for-exposure-not-cash model. But [...]

By: The fashion report « The Hyperlocalist

The fashion report « The Hyperlocalist — Tue, 18 May 2010 17:23:54 +0000

[...] without fair compensation. That’s what larger media outlets like Forbes.com and The Washington Post call “content for exposure” (or more precisely, content for exploitation), and the [...]

By: Gary Warner

Gary Warner — Tue, 18 May 2010 01:10:58 +0000

We’ve always had “content-for-exposure.” They are called “letters to the editor.” The only difference was that no one was fooling anybody before. Now both creator and “publisher” are fooling themselves.

By: WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model | Mediapunk

WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model | Mediapunk — Mon, 17 May 2010 21:33:03 +0000

[...] Nieman Journalism Lab: WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model var a2a_config = a2a_config || {}; a2a_config.linkname="WaPo wades into HuffPo’s unpaid content model"; a2a_config.linkurl="http://mediapunk.net/2010/05/wapo-wades-into-huffpo%e2%80%99s-unpaid-content-model/"; [...]

By: Jennifer Deseo

Jennifer Deseo — Mon, 17 May 2010 15:59:47 +0000

Ugh, I hate that content-for-exposure model. It’s more like a content-for-exploitation model. In the end, a publication gets what it pays for.

By: WaPo creates community-powered political site | Grogger

WaPo creates community-powered political site | Grogger — Mon, 17 May 2010 14:43:42 +0000

[...] Washington Post has launched a new site, the “Political Blog Network.” Harvard’s Nieman Lab reports that it “is packaging content written by unpaid bloggers, hoping to engage its audience, give [...]