<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter looks like a social network but feels like news media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter no es una red social</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-170754</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter no es una red social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-170754</guid>
		<description>[...] comprobarlo, aunque igual viene bien. Al respecto de ese informe, hace algunos meses, Jason Fry posteó que ese estudio, realizado por cuatro investigadores coreanos y presentado en la International [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comprobarlo, aunque igual viene bien. Al respecto de ese informe, hace algunos meses, Jason Fry posteó que ese estudio, realizado por cuatro investigadores coreanos y presentado en la International [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iJump.co.nz &#187; Social Media Junction wrap-up</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-115349</link>
		<dc:creator>iJump.co.nz &#187; Social Media Junction wrap-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 02:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-115349</guid>
		<description>[...] been very powerful as blog distribution mechanisms. I mentioned a Korean study that showed how Twitter is a broadcast medium, with the ability for dialogue when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been very powerful as blog distribution mechanisms. I mentioned a Korean study that showed how Twitter is a broadcast medium, with the ability for dialogue when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Reading &#8211; 14th May 2010 &#171; Curiously Persistent</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112889</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended Reading &#8211; 14th May 2010 &#171; Curiously Persistent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112889</guid>
		<description>[...] Fry thinks Twitter more closely resembles traditional news media than social media, due to the asymmetric broadcasting of its power [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fry thinks Twitter more closely resembles traditional news media than social media, due to the asymmetric broadcasting of its power [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112446</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everybody for their thoughts.

Howard, what I meant by a level playing field was that the Twitter UI of icon, @ symbol and bit of text makes everybody the same in someone&#039;s news feed -- there&#039;s nothing to differentiate me from Ashton or Oprah. That and Twitter&#039;s public nature creates a certain pressure to reply or acknowledge that you don&#039;t see in blog comments or other situations.

Kingsley, I don&#039;t think we disagree. I think the potential for communications carries a lot of value in its own right, and the barriers for reciprocity are lower than on, say, Facebook, where someone has to agree to be friends for us to have any meaningful or lasting public discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everybody for their thoughts.</p>
<p>Howard, what I meant by a level playing field was that the Twitter UI of icon, @ symbol and bit of text makes everybody the same in someone&#8217;s news feed &#8212; there&#8217;s nothing to differentiate me from Ashton or Oprah. That and Twitter&#8217;s public nature creates a certain pressure to reply or acknowledge that you don&#8217;t see in blog comments or other situations.</p>
<p>Kingsley, I don&#8217;t think we disagree. I think the potential for communications carries a lot of value in its own right, and the barriers for reciprocity are lower than on, say, Facebook, where someone has to agree to be friends for us to have any meaningful or lasting public discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Tagbo</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112440</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley Tagbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112440</guid>
		<description>Social networks are defined by many different types of interaction or common interest.  This does not have to include reciprocity.  Youtube comments don&#039;t require any reciprocation, but there often is reciprocation. Sometimes it&#039;s to answer a question and sometimes it&#039;s to crack a joke or insult.  Generally, the comments share the tone of the video on that page.  This is also the case with Twitter topics.  I don&#039;t believe untapped reciprocity affects the value, as not everyone has time to reciprocate to hundreds of other people.  Most people simply want to know what other people are thinking; this is what social networks really provide for users. That&#039;s why everyone follows Ashton Kutcher, as a lot of people want to know his current status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social networks are defined by many different types of interaction or common interest.  This does not have to include reciprocity.  Youtube comments don&#8217;t require any reciprocation, but there often is reciprocation. Sometimes it&#8217;s to answer a question and sometimes it&#8217;s to crack a joke or insult.  Generally, the comments share the tone of the video on that page.  This is also the case with Twitter topics.  I don&#8217;t believe untapped reciprocity affects the value, as not everyone has time to reciprocate to hundreds of other people.  Most people simply want to know what other people are thinking; this is what social networks really provide for users. That&#8217;s why everyone follows Ashton Kutcher, as a lot of people want to know his current status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter ja no és cap tonteria (i II) &#124; Reflexions sobre periodisme, comunicació i cultura</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112280</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter ja no és cap tonteria (i II) &#124; Reflexions sobre periodisme, comunicació i cultura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112280</guid>
		<description>[...] a mi, el punt més rellevant no és tant sí Twitter és o no és una xarxa social (tant se me&#8217;n dóna què és) com el fet que es tracti d&#8217;un espai on es comparteix i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a mi, el punt més rellevant no és tant sí Twitter és o no és una xarxa social (tant se me&#8217;n dóna què és) com el fet que es tracti d&#8217;un espai on es comparteix i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Por qué Twitter no es una red social? &#124; Blog XYOX</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112134</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Por qué Twitter no es una red social? &#124; Blog XYOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 08:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112134</guid>
		<description>[...] más que a otra cosa, aunque se trata de un debate interesante. Así lo plantea Jason Fry en un artículo en Nieman Journalism Lab, en el que formula algunas preguntas en relación a las conclusiones del estudio que niegan la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] más que a otra cosa, aunque se trata de un debate interesante. Así lo plantea Jason Fry en un artículo en Nieman Journalism Lab, en el que formula algunas preguntas en relación a las conclusiones del estudio que niegan la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Twitter a Social Network? &#171; Reinventing the Newsroom</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112095</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Twitter a Social Network? &#171; Reinventing the Newsroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112095</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Twitter a Social&#160;Network?  Posted in Social Media, Twitter by reinventingthenewsroom on May 7, 2010   This post originally appeared at Nieman Journalism Lab. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Twitter a Social&nbsp;Network?  Posted in Social Media, Twitter by reinventingthenewsroom on May 7, 2010   This post originally appeared at Nieman Journalism Lab. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-112045</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-112045</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been bemused at the frequent mocking of Twitter as a constant flow of ephemera and navel-gazing, when the overwhelming majority of tweets I see are of the form of a short comment about an article or blog post, followed by a shortened URL to that article or blog post. In effect, Twitter works for me as a magazine&#039;s table of content, with the magazine in continuous publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been bemused at the frequent mocking of Twitter as a constant flow of ephemera and navel-gazing, when the overwhelming majority of tweets I see are of the form of a short comment about an article or blog post, followed by a shortened URL to that article or blog post. In effect, Twitter works for me as a magazine&#8217;s table of content, with the magazine in continuous publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slats Grobnik</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-111922</link>
		<dc:creator>Slats Grobnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-111922</guid>
		<description>Very awesome, very true. Twitter is like an open news wire you subscribe to, in which you are the editor in choosing which stories run (in your browser, i.e. get read). Reminds me of this:
http://bit.ly/aD8c19</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very awesome, very true. Twitter is like an open news wire you subscribe to, in which you are the editor in choosing which stories run (in your browser, i.e. get read). Reminds me of this:<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/aD8c19" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aD8c19</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-111858</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 05:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-111858</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting study! I guess, in a way they are right, although the term social media is subjective and it depends on how the user purports it to be. It can work as a news feed, or it can be a source of connectivity with people you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting study! I guess, in a way they are right, although the term social media is subjective and it depends on how the user purports it to be. It can work as a news feed, or it can be a source of connectivity with people you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conversation and relationships &#171; now &#124; worldwidewestern</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-111786</link>
		<dc:creator>conversation and relationships &#171; now &#124; worldwidewestern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-111786</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Fry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Fry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LivePaola</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-111271</link>
		<dc:creator>LivePaola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-111271</guid>
		<description>Networks built on asymmetric relationships have different features from those built on symmetric ones. Neither type is better or worse. It&#039;s just up to users to determine how much trust they will place in one or the other. http://livepaola.wordpress.com/2010/04/10/social-networks-choose-how-you-use-them/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Networks built on asymmetric relationships have different features from those built on symmetric ones. Neither type is better or worse. It&#8217;s just up to users to determine how much trust they will place in one or the other. <a href="http://livepaola.wordpress.com/2010/04/10/social-networks-choose-how-you-use-them/" rel="nofollow">http://livepaola.wordpress.com/2010/04/10/social-networks-choose-how-you-use-them/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110962</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 22:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110962</guid>
		<description>This is important information, Jason; thanks for flagging it.

Your conclusion seems pretty vague to me. Yeah, sure, anything is possible. But what actually happens is a lot more meaningful. Consider that earlier study alongside this one: 73% of Twitter users have tweeted 10 or fewer times and 34% of users have never tweeted at all http://bit.ly/axLotS

As for the level playing field: huh? As near as I can tell, the only person in the top 20 who isn&#039;t a celebrity is Barack Obama -- and I doubt he spends much time on his tweets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is important information, Jason; thanks for flagging it.</p>
<p>Your conclusion seems pretty vague to me. Yeah, sure, anything is possible. But what actually happens is a lot more meaningful. Consider that earlier study alongside this one: 73% of Twitter users have tweeted 10 or fewer times and 34% of users have never tweeted at all <a href="http://bit.ly/axLotS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/axLotS</a></p>
<p>As for the level playing field: huh? As near as I can tell, the only person in the top 20 who isn&#8217;t a celebrity is Barack Obama &#8212; and I doubt he spends much time on his tweets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110936</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110936</guid>
		<description>wow. this article is being tweeted all over the place, but only has 2 comments and 2 trackbacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. this article is being tweeted all over the place, but only has 2 comments and 2 trackbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mostmodernist</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110902</link>
		<dc:creator>mostmodernist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110902</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think media people use the socials like regular folk do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think media people use the socials like regular folk do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110893</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110893</guid>
		<description>Thanks for such a thoughtful, and thought-provoking, article!  As a medium, I agree that it&#039;s the potential for interaction that&#039;s so compelling, and that sets twitter apart from traditional media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such a thoughtful, and thought-provoking, article!  As a medium, I agree that it&#8217;s the potential for interaction that&#8217;s so compelling, and that sets twitter apart from traditional media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and Social Networks &#8212; and an Announcement &#171; Reinventing the Newsroom</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110855</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and Social Networks &#8212; and an Announcement &#171; Reinventing the Newsroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110855</guid>
		<description>[...] an&#160;Announcement  Posted in Social Media, Twitter by reinventingthenewsroom on May 7, 2010   My first post for Nieman Journalism Lab appears today, and looks at a recent research paper&#8217;s conclusion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an&nbsp;Announcement  Posted in Social Media, Twitter by reinventingthenewsroom on May 7, 2010   My first post for Nieman Journalism Lab appears today, and looks at a recent research paper&#8217;s conclusion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: Newsweek on the block, Twitter as a journalistic system, and more paywall rumblings » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/05/why-twitter-looks-like-a-social-network-but-feels-like-news-media/comment-page-1/#comment-110815</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Newsweek on the block, Twitter as a journalistic system, and more paywall rumblings » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16116#comment-110815</guid>
		<description>[...] it more of a resemblance to a news medium than to its fellow social networks online. Our Jason Fry also gave his take, noting the potential value of reciprocity even in an environment that doesn&#8217;t require [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it more of a resemblance to a news medium than to its fellow social networks online. Our Jason Fry also gave his take, noting the potential value of reciprocity even in an environment that doesn&#8217;t require [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

