<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash from every corner: Three kooky ways Vancouver&#8217;s Tyee pays for top-shelf regional journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/06/cash-from-every-corner-three-kooky-ways-vancouvers-tyee-pays-for-top-shelf-regional-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/06/cash-from-every-corner-three-kooky-ways-vancouvers-tyee-pays-for-top-shelf-regional-journalism/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Beers</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/06/cash-from-every-corner-three-kooky-ways-vancouvers-tyee-pays-for-top-shelf-regional-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-131198</link>
		<dc:creator>David Beers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=16921#comment-131198</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this write-up Michael, but why the descriptor &#039;kooky&#039;? You highlighted three sources of revenue as &#039;kooky&#039;. &#039;Topical pledge drives&#039;. Do not the big media firms relentlessly survey and focus group their readers, and aren&#039;t web sites operators told to assiduously monitor their traffic? This just makes the relationship more transparent and democratic. &#039;Interest group ownership&#039;. More &#039;kooky&#039; than media baron ownernship? You do know that Holland&#039;s second largest paper&#039;s largest shareholders are unions, right? And finally the &#039;kooky&#039; idea of renting out extra space to likeminded people. Look at any traditional media firms&#039; lists of assests and real estate will be prominent. Three desks. There&#039;s our real estate holdings, helping to subsidize our journalism! See, we&#039;re not kooky. We&#039;re old fashioned, traditional, solidly inside the box. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this write-up Michael, but why the descriptor &#8216;kooky&#8217;? You highlighted three sources of revenue as &#8216;kooky&#8217;. &#8216;Topical pledge drives&#8217;. Do not the big media firms relentlessly survey and focus group their readers, and aren&#8217;t web sites operators told to assiduously monitor their traffic? This just makes the relationship more transparent and democratic. &#8216;Interest group ownership&#8217;. More &#8216;kooky&#8217; than media baron ownernship? You do know that Holland&#8217;s second largest paper&#8217;s largest shareholders are unions, right? And finally the &#8216;kooky&#8217; idea of renting out extra space to likeminded people. Look at any traditional media firms&#8217; lists of assests and real estate will be prominent. Three desks. There&#8217;s our real estate holdings, helping to subsidize our journalism! See, we&#8217;re not kooky. We&#8217;re old fashioned, traditional, solidly inside the box. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

