<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Newsonomics of the dead cat bounce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Newsonomics of the dead cat bounce - Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-139691</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Newsonomics of the dead cat bounce - Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=20065#comment-139691</guid>
		<description>[...] Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-139538</link>
		<dc:creator>rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=20065#comment-139538</guid>
		<description>I get the sense, Doc, you&#039;ll see the industry as a dead cat no matter what the Q2 numbers are. If the numbers are good, are you open to the explanation the industry&#039;s troubles of late were as much cyclical as secular? And I don&#039;t care whether profit is coming from digital or print -- as long as it&#039;s coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the sense, Doc, you&#8217;ll see the industry as a dead cat no matter what the Q2 numbers are. If the numbers are good, are you open to the explanation the industry&#8217;s troubles of late were as much cyclical as secular? And I don&#8217;t care whether profit is coming from digital or print &#8212; as long as it&#8217;s coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-139454</link>
		<dc:creator>rick edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=20065#comment-139454</guid>
		<description>Insightful as always, Ken.

My own nearly concurrent take focuses on whether there is a consensus long-term strategy for the newspaper companies.  We know the direction, but what&#039;s the desired destinaation? http://tinyurl.com/2g99t9o

BTW, should we be looking one of these years for measures of profit in digital ventures in addition to the several of revenue growth you cite?  My sense has been that an accurate tally of true costs remains hard to come by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful as always, Ken.</p>
<p>My own nearly concurrent take focuses on whether there is a consensus long-term strategy for the newspaper companies.  We know the direction, but what&#8217;s the desired destinaation? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2g99t9o" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2g99t9o</a></p>
<p>BTW, should we be looking one of these years for measures of profit in digital ventures in addition to the several of revenue growth you cite?  My sense has been that an accurate tally of true costs remains hard to come by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second quarter could be Gannett&#8217;s most encouraging performance in years</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/the-newsonomics-of-the-dead-cat-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-139438</link>
		<dc:creator>Second quarter could be Gannett&#8217;s most encouraging performance in years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=20065#comment-139438</guid>
		<description>[...] numbers on Friday, will be the first major newspaper publisher to report how it fared in 2Q. &#124;&#124; More on the earnings season from Ken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] numbers on Friday, will be the first major newspaper publisher to report how it fared in 2Q. || More on the earnings season from Ken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

