<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Review: Time&#8217;s non-pay paywall, free vs. pay in Britain and what to do with content farms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/</link>
	<description>A collaborative effort to figure out the future of journalism. A project of Harvard University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: Time’s non-pay paywall, free vs. pay in Britain and what to do with content farms &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/comment-page-1/#comment-144152</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Time’s non-pay paywall, free vs. pay in Britain and what to do with content farms &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=19952#comment-144152</guid>
		<description>[...] review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab on July 9, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab on July 9, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: WikiLeaks&#8217; new journalism order, a paywall&#8217;s purpose, and a future for Flipboard » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/comment-page-1/#comment-143221</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: WikiLeaks&#8217; new journalism order, a paywall&#8217;s purpose, and a future for Flipboard » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=19952#comment-143221</guid>
		<description>[...] readers out with a paywall: The Times and Sunday Times of London put up their online paywall earlier this month, the first of Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s newspapers to set off on his paid-content mission (though some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] readers out with a paywall: The Times and Sunday Times of London put up their online paywall earlier this month, the first of Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s newspapers to set off on his paid-content mission (though some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Terenzio</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/comment-page-1/#comment-138009</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Terenzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=19952#comment-138009</guid>
		<description>Time Inc. apparantly has no clue. They are living in the antiquated era of the industrial age. I&#039;ve spoken with some of their employees and they make a newspaper company look cutting edge.

Pay or not, the fact that word &#039;wall&#039; is used speaks volumes. Rather, it should be &#039;flow&#039;.

A company like Google collects all types of information and nobody thinks of &#039;walls&#039;

Walls are the invention of those that are still producing what once had value and has now become a commodity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Inc. apparantly has no clue. They are living in the antiquated era of the industrial age. I&#8217;ve spoken with some of their employees and they make a newspaper company look cutting edge.</p>
<p>Pay or not, the fact that word &#8216;wall&#8217; is used speaks volumes. Rather, it should be &#8216;flow&#8217;.</p>
<p>A company like Google collects all types of information and nobody thinks of &#8216;walls&#8217;</p>
<p>Walls are the invention of those that are still producing what once had value and has now become a commodity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are you willing to pay for news? &#171; All That Media</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/this-week-in-review-times-non-pay-paywall-free-vs-pay-in-britain-and-what-to-do-with-content-farms/comment-page-1/#comment-137815</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you willing to pay for news? &#171; All That Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=19952#comment-137815</guid>
		<description>[...] you willing to pay for&#160;news? In Journalism, New Media on July 9, 2010 at 3:59 pm  This Week in Review: Time’s non-pay paywall, free vs. pay in Britain and what to do with content f....    &#9654; No Responses   /* 0) { jQuery(&#039;#comments&#039;).show(&#039;&#039;, change_location()); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you willing to pay for&nbsp;news? In Journalism, New Media on July 9, 2010 at 3:59 pm  This Week in Review: Time’s non-pay paywall, free vs. pay in Britain and what to do with content f&#8230;.    &#9654; No Responses   /* 0) { jQuery(&#39;#comments&#39;).show(&#39;&#39;, change_location()); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

