Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The California Journalism Preservation Act would do more harm than good. Here’s how the state might better help news
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 10, 2011, 9 a.m.

#Twittermakesyouloved: Jill Abramson’s now on Twitter

“What’s the over/under on when @JillAbramson’s first tweet will arrive?” Felix Salmon tweeted yesterday. “I’m betting not until September, when she takes over from @nytkeller.”

Turns out, he didn’t have to wait that long. Shortly after he posted his question, the Reuters blogger got his reply:

@felixsalmon wrong!

The answer came from the newly minted — and newly verified — account of Abramson herself. The soon-to-be Times editor was fresh out of a “twittorial” conducted by Times social media editors Liz Heron and Lexi Mainland.

So what did she learn during the session?

“Jill didn’t need a lot of encouragement to try Twitter,” Heron told me over email. The twittorial “was really just to show her around the site and get her versed in Twitter’s unique conventions, like @handles and hashtags,” she said. “We suggested a few initial accounts she might like to follow within the newsroom, and she’ll be building that list herself as she goes along. All in all, she took to it quite naturally. She’s already sending cheeky @-replies.”

The reply to Salmon was actually the new Times editor’s second tweet. (The first: “I’m back from a terrific seminar at the @ArmyWarCollege in Pennsylvania on national security issues. More later…”) And — I promise I will never watch anyone’s Twitter feed so closely again, but — the third was a “thanks pal” reply to the Times’ op-ed page editor, Andy Rosenthal.

On the one hand, of course, it’s ridiculous to care so much about a single Twitter feed. “Getting Twitter” isn’t the same as “getting the web”; whether the Times’ new editor personally takes to social media more readily than her predecessor is largely beside the point. (Jay Rosen: “I don’t think it’s weird that Jill Abramson hasn’t tweeted a thing yet http://journ.us/kr85le Nor do I care if she ever does. Run the Times!”)

Then again, though, during this interregnum, we media-watchers (and especially we future-of-media-watchers) are always looking for clues as to the general mindset of the person who will guide the Times into its future. Is she open to the web? Is she open to openness? Does she, you know, “get it”? Until September, when actions will speak more loudly than words, Twitter is a kind of default proxy for overall webbiness.

In that sense, yesterday’s tweets, conversational and cheeky and generally webby, brought good news. (Salmon: “@jillabramson is officially my new favorite person on Twitter http://twitpic.com/598mys.”) Heron was probably speaking for many denizens of the twitterverse when she noted: “We’re looking forward to her tweets.”

POSTED     June 10, 2011, 9 a.m.
Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The California Journalism Preservation Act would do more harm than good. Here’s how the state might better help news
“If there are resources to be put to work, we must ask where those resources should come from, who should receive them, and on what basis they should be distributed.”
Dateline Totality: How local news outlets in the eclipse’s path are covering the covering
“Celestial events tend to draw highly engaged audiences, and this one is no exception.”
The conspiracy-loving Epoch Times is thinking about opening…a journalism school?
It would, um, “champion the same values of ‘truth and traditional’ as The Epoch Times” and, er, “nurture in the next generation of media professionals,” ahem, “the highest standards of personal integrity, fairness, and truth-seeking.”