Twitter  NowThis News pivots, dropping the News from its name nie.mn/1oieoki  
Nieman Journalism Lab
Pushing to the future of journalism — A project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard

The Onion’s CTO: Our paywall experiment is just that

America’s Finest News Source wants to know whether people will pay for fake news.

When word got out about The Onion testing a paid content model overseas, Gawker declared the beginning of the end: “It only affects dirty foreigners at the moment, but everyone knows damn well that these things always presage a domestic rollout. So get ready to pay for The Onion….”

But not so fast, says Michael Greer, the Onion’s chief technology officer. “By ‘test,’ we sincerely mean it. We want to know how people respond and act,” he said. “We’re not rushing.” The Onion, ever like a real news organization, is dipping its toe in the water and experimenting with paid content.

The Onion’s metered model is like that of The New York Times: Only hardcore fans are asked to pay. After reading five articles in 30 days, users are prompted to subscribe for $2.95 a month or $29.95 a year. The homepage and inside sections remain free, and the vast majority of Onion’s readers — the thousands of people who share funny headlines with their friends — “will never even notice,” Greer said.

Greer thinks America’s Finest News Source has something else in common with the Times: Few competitors can match the quality of The Onion’s journalistic satire, so readers might be more likely to pay for it. “I don’t think everybody can act this way, but it’s true. We think our content is very valuable and unique,” he said. “We have a great relationship with our fans, too, so they value us.” (He points to this recent poll of New Yorkers, who were more willing to pay for The Onion than water or sex.)

It seems Americans are willing to pay for fake news on other platforms, too. Readers on the Kindle and Nook pay $2.49 a month for a digital subscription. At Amazon’s Kindle Store, The Onion is ranked No. 5 in Newspapers (behind the Washington Post, in front of the International Herald Tribune). It’s No. 4 on Barnes & Noble’s Nook store (and beats out the Post).

The pay model is being tested in every country but the United States — except, that is, in places where Americans troops are engaged in combat, Greer said. (Apparently The Onion is huge with service members: “They send us pictures of themselves in Onion t-shirts with machine guns — that’s a big fan base for us. We didn’t want to test with them,” he said.) Greer acknowledges the overseas experiment is not apples-to-apples when it comes to American audiences — famously loathe to paying for news on the web — but it has to start somewhere.

He said there is no when, or even an if, for an American rollout, and the monthly article limit could change during testing. Although the experiment is only a few days old, Greer said the feedback has been mostly positive and “a lot” of people have signed up.

One group that’s exempted from the sign-up, though: members of The A.V. Club, The Onion’s pop-culture community site. In fact, The Onion has had to tamp down discontent among the Club’s members: Earlier today, in fact, its news editor, Sean O’Neal, came out and assured A.V. Club members that their slice of The Onion isn’t affected by the pay meter.

And that’s because, Greer said, the A.V. Club audience is different from The Onion’s overall audience in a significant way: It’s not just a collective of people who like good content but a community of people who like good content. Its members “are much more focused on talking to each other,” Greer noted. And “they don’t want to be charged for their belonging to that community — whereas I think they would feel differently about being charged for content that’s being provided to them. It’s a very different thing.”

                                   
What to read next
Mashable_GrumpyCat-cc
Joseph Lichterman    July 22, 2014
The site known for social media and tech coverage has hired nearly 30 more editorial staffers since October and, like BuzzFeed before it, is expanding into more general interest news.
  • Pingback: The Onion’s CTO: Its paywall experiment is just that | Dzker

  • Cynthia Typaldos

    At Kachingle we are experimenting with voluntary micropayment contributions to the Onion. 
    http://www.kachingle.com/m/1919

  • Pingback: Bullet Points: The Downside of Low Turnover; Making Your Company Resilient; the Point of Social Media Experts | The Hired Guns Blog

  • http://twitter.com/Somdomite Edward E

    I would suggest an alternative to the Onion-The WashingtonFancy.com It’s genuinely free and has more articles updated daily. 

  • Pingback: No 'Onion' Paywall For US Visitors In The Works, CTO Says

  • Adam

    Half the point of the site is clicking through to different silly articles….scanning it for half a second, and deciding if it is worth reading….I got locked out today after flipping through half the pictures of the day….that is BS and frankly the end of it for me.  I’m not even going to mention it anymore…RIP.  P.S. If ad revenue isn’t doing it for you, demand more from the advertisers/take control of your ad revenue from 3rd parties.

  • dn

    It is very easy to circumvent the pawall for international users. This worked fine for me: http://theayd.in/post/8775699125/circumventing-the-onion-com-paywall

  • Pingback: The Onion’s CTO: Our paywall experiment is just that » Nieman Journalism Lab | Cheap Kindle Online

  • tut

    I like how this is written for the ‘hard core fan’. Five pages a MONTH is hardly ‘hard core fan’ territory – and by ‘read’ they mean ‘open’ – so if you see an Onion Weekend cover you can read in thumb form – for god sake don’t open it! It counts to your precious five! 

    God, what happens if I send an article to a friend? They better REALLY trust my option because opening it deducts from their precious five! It’s ridiculous that we’re made to feel we’re really welching off them at five pages a month. 

  • A Brit

    Onions are not for repeated nibbling at 5 articles a month,  they are for an occasional scoffing (followed inevitably by indigestion). 

    My reacton to finding a paywall appearing on the onion site was two-fold:

    1) The cycle of “must be a technical fault”,  slow comprehension,  then disbelieving, and follow through with the usual stages of grief (…but recognizing the costs that must have escalated from the transition to so much multimedia content)
    2) and….   Straight to “Private eye”‘ to finally put off the inevitable and turn an long-time occasional habit at the news agents into an annual subscription.

    Has the Luddite tendency of Lord Gnome finally paided out as a valid strategy? 
    Paywalls do put it all back into perspective.

  • Joeh157

    I’m teaching in Thailand and not getting paid enough to subscribe or pay for content on the Onion, but would really like to check the articles to get a taste of home. Come on! I’ve supported the onion for many years! what the hell is this. I don’t mind the constant advertising, whats with the paywall??

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=575791583 Stephen Coleman

    I’m an American teaching in Taiwan and I’ve always enjoyed reading the high quality satire from The Onion. However, their paywall locked me out today. With so much content out there on the Internet, I’m 99% sure I won’t subscribe. 

  • Sarah

    First time I’ve tried to read the Onion in years… and I can’t read it. Paywall. Great.

    Can’t be bothered with them.