Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Collaborate or die: A new initiative wants to make it easier for national and local outlets to work together
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 2, 2012, 8:02 p.m.
LINK: creativecommons.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   April 2, 2012

CC’s Diane Peters runs through some of the updates. Most of interest to me is something that isn’t updated: the definition of what constitutes “noncommercial” use of a Creative Commons work. (Something we’ve written about before.)

As for NonCommercial, more discussion is necessary if any of the current proposals or arguments for changing that definition are to be advanced. Consequently, we have left the definition unchanged in this first draft. On both of these issues, look for prompts from us on the license discussion list and this blog, and please contribute your voice to the discussion.

Specifically:

While many community members have expressed concern about the ambiguity of the license definition, we do not believe there is a sufficiently clear or compelling alternative presented yet meriting a change. We look forward to receiving more input about the definition of NC and related proposals during this public comment period.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Collaborate or die: A new initiative wants to make it easier for national and local outlets to work together
“Where you find resistance to collaboration is where you’re finding news enterprises hastening their own demise.”
How NPR factchecked the first presidential debate in realtime, on top of a live transcript
More than 6 million users checked out the factcheck, sending record traffic (especially on mobile) to the site.
Hot Pod: Will the next wave of audio advertising make podcasts sound like (yuck) commercial radio?
Plus: Panoply expands to London, Midroll makes a bigger bet on live events, and Bloomberg finds audio success.