Nieman Foundation at Harvard
Few people are actually trapped in filter bubbles. Why do they like to say that they are?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 10, 2012, 12:31 p.m.
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   April 10, 2012

Joel Johnson, veteran tech blogger and new managing editor of Animal New York, makes the case that comments aren’t just [pick one: abrasive/abusive/nonsensical/useless] — they’re bad for business. Along with the usual complaints, there’s this:

But here’s the new thing: I’ve had two separate discussions with friends who run mid-sized internet properties — we’re talking high hundreds of thousands to millions of unique users a month — and they’ve both recently completed heavy analysis on their traffic and come to the somewhat shocking conclusion that the people who actually read comments are a small fraction of one percent of their entire readership.

I’m not talking about people who comment, which is an even smaller percentage. I’m talking about people who read comments, the supposed traffic-and-revenue generating nebulous “community” that supports nascent internet media publications and make all that engineering and moderator staffing worthwhile. Less than a percent. And if you measure the number of people who actually scroll to the end of a post and read all the comments, it’s even less.

Unsurprisingly, comments are closed on his piece.

Ken Fisher, founder of Ars Technica, concurs with the estimate:

(Worth noting that Ars puts its comments on a separate page from the stories themselves, requiring an extra click.)

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Few people are actually trapped in filter bubbles. Why do they like to say that they are?
Plus: Are your Google results really that different from your neighbor’s?
3 ways Facebook and other social media companies could clean up their acts — if they wanted to
“These moves may hurt the firms’ finances, but they would also demonstrate serious and lasting commitment to limiting their platforms’ usefulness in political manipulation campaigns.”
Google is launching a voice-driven version of Google News for smart speakers and phones
“News on smart speakers is not living up to the promise of what it could be.”