Nieman Foundation at Harvard
Slate is taking steps to reduce its page load time by 75 percent
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 26, 2013, 10:14 a.m.

Pocket aims to get on publishers’ good sides with a new read-it-later stats package

See how your stories are performing — and whether you have bragging rights over your newsroom cubicle-mate.

Pocket, one of the three biggest players in the read-it-later space (with Instapaper and Readability), just announced Pocket for Publishers, a suite of tools to track how your content is flowing through its service. If you’ve ever wondered which of your stories are getting “read later” the most, here’s your answer. (Or at least one-third of it.)

Publishers on board include, The Verge, Bloomberg Businessweek, USA Today, BuzzFeed, WordPress, SB Nation, The Next Web, GigaOm, Polygon, New York Review of Books, Matter, Aeon Magazine, The Billfold, and Longreads.

Nieman Lab also got a sneak peek — here’s what the publisher dashboard looks like:


So one in three Pocket users “opened content after it was saved.” (It’s unclear whether that’s content saved in the last 30 days, or whether it’s opens from the last 30 days. It’s also unclear how that compares to the broader Pocketverse; I’m an Instapaper user and I can assure you that I open fewer than one-third of the articles I save.)

Average lifespan is, according to Pocket, “the period of time in which most (80%) activity occurred.” That’s similar to the metrics Pocket released last week for a few sample stories.

Also note the breakdown both by authors and by stories — the gamification of journalism continues apace! — and the distinction between raw saved count and “impact,” which Pocket says “favors loyalty and quality of content over raw popularity.” Not sure how that gets algorithmically determined. It would also be great, obviously, to see raw numbers rather than just ranks — I don’t have any clue here whether a story’s been saved once or 500 times in Pocket.

Update: Proof that I am not the brightest: You can, in fact, get those raw numbers just by clicking through to individual articles. Here’s the data page for one of our stories:


In this case, a story that was posted on a Friday saw its biggest reading activity (or at least opening activity) the following Monday. Having the raw data also gives us a first glimpse into the size of this world. A typical Nieman Lab post seem to average around 50 Pocket saves — a number significantly below Twitter or Facebook shares, but also a lot higher than Google +1s or LinkedIn shares. Over the past 30 days, the five most-saved Nieman Lab articles had 331, 215, 194, 184, and 167 saves — quite respectable, especially considering how the read-it-later market is split between multiple outlets.)

That message clickthrough rate is, I assume, artificially crazy high since the feature just launched. What is it, anyway?


It’s a tool that lets you embed a footer message at the end of stories saved in Pocket. You can see the first one I made in the image. It’ll be interesting to see what that number ends up hovering around — “people who’ve just finished reading a longish piece by your publication” would seem to be pretty fertile ground for upsells or other messaging. (Pocket will also A/B test multiple messages and let you know which ones get the most action.)

While few if any publishers have formally backed out of read-it-later services, they haven’t exactly been the best of friends. Services like Pocket offer a refined reading environment, sure, but they also strip out most or all of the ads that accompany the story. And maybe more importantly in the long run, they encourage brand loyalty at the service level (Pocket, Instapaper, Readability) rather than at the producer level (The New Yorker, GQ, Wired). So it makes sense for someone like Pocket to try to add value for those publishers — tracking the stories that someone “reads later” can serve as a useful quality-oriented supplement to tracking pageviews.

Along with the dashboard and footer messages, Pocket also announced a “Send to Pocket” button for websites — will read-it-later services be the ones to bring back the buttonpocalypse? — and code to allow a similar feature to be embedded in mobile apps.

POSTED     March 26, 2013, 10:14 a.m.
Show comments  
Show tags
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Slate is taking steps to reduce its page load time by 75 percent
Slate Group vice chairman Dan Check discusses how Slate plans to speed up its site, how it’s thinking about ad blockers, and why it’s participating in platforms like Apple News.
This portable FM transmitter brings information to people in crisis
“When there is no existing infrastructure that is stable for any kind of media, we thought, let’s come back to good old radio.”
How Esquire built Esquire Classic, a new standalone digital archive
The process took about a year and required the scanning and tagging of more than 50,000 articles dating back to 1933.
What to read next
As giant platforms rise, local news is getting crushed
The quest for scale, driven by the distribution power of a few enormous technology platforms, is killing the business case for local news. Will anything take its place?
890What happened after 7 news sites got rid of reader comments
Recode, Reuters, Popular Science, The Week, Mic, The Verge, and USA Today’s FTW have all shut off reader comments in the past year. Here’s how they’re all using social media to encourage reader discussion.
699Facebook woos journalists with Signal, a dashboard to gather news across Facebook and Instagram
Signal helps journalists find, source, and embed content from Facebook and Instagram.
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Daily Beast
Associated Press
St. Louis Beacon
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Las Vegas Sun