Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
PressPad, an attempt to bring some class diversity to posh British journalism, is shutting down
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 12, 2016, 12:39 p.m.
Mobile & Apps

The New Yorker Today is the magazine’s new iPhone app for its online articles (plus cartoons)

The app will be free for a time while The New Yorker figures out how many articles readers can access before hitting the paywall.

The New Yorker this morning launched The New Yorker Today, a new iPhone app built to offer users an up-to-date look at content from NewYorker.com. Unlike the existing New Yorker app, which is home exclusively to content from the print magazine, the new app will showcase the latest stories, blog posts, and videos from the magazine’s website — in addition to articles from the magazine and its archives.

The app is an extension of The New Yorker’s efforts to increase its presence on the web while also staying true to its history and brand. NewYorker.com editor Nicholas Thompson said the goal is to get more New Yorker readers coming back every day — and, hopefully, convince more of them to subscribe. “Our instinct is that for a brand like ours that has a lot of loyal readers that are reading all the time, it’s very important to give them an extremely quick way to read everything,” he said.

While the app was designed primary to give users an “intentionally basic” and clean reading experience, its “neatest, most crazy” addition, according to Thompson, is “Cartoons at Random,” a feature lets users swipe Tinder-style though 8,000 New Yorker cartoons. (Though, unlike Tinder, swiping left or right isn’t passing judgment on the cartoon’s quality.) The app’s only other major feature is a bookmarking tool that lets users save articles to read later. (It created a somewhat analogous tool for desktop readers last fall.)

The New Yorker is making the app free to download and use for its first month. The magazine plans to use that period to figure out how to best optimize the app’s paywall — much as it did with the current NewYorker.com paywall, which asks users to pay up once they’ve read six articles in a month. It’s been an effective strategy so far. In 2015, the first full year the paywall was in effect, The New Yorker saw digital subscriptions increase 43 percent. The New Yorker has yet to determine how its strategy will change with The New Yorker Today, but it’s clear that the magazine is trying to make it as easy as possible for users to subscribe: It takes just two taps to subscribe to NewYorker.com from the app. From the app’s launch piece:

The app is available right now on iPhones, and everything, for a while at least, is free. If you’re already a digital subscriber, or you’ve linked your print subscription to our Web site, it’ll be free forever once you log in.

Publishers — particularly magazine publishers — have had an on-again, off-again relationship with apps over the past few years. While apps were heralded as the ideal way to engage readers on mobile, for most publishers apps are to mobile what the homepage is to desktop: a feature that few people beyond a relatively small core of readers will interact with once, much less on a daily basis.

“I don’t think there is anyone here who isn’t cognizant of all of that,” Thompson said. “But we’re also convinced that if you have the kind of loyal readers that we do, then creating an app like this one makes sense.”

POSTED     April 12, 2016, 12:39 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Mobile & Apps
Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
PressPad, an attempt to bring some class diversity to posh British journalism, is shutting down
“While there is even more need for this intervention than when we began the project, the initiative needs more resources than the current team can provide.”
Is the Texas Tribune an example or an exception? A conversation with Evan Smith about earned income
“I think risk aversion is the thing that’s killing our business right now.”
The California Journalism Preservation Act would do more harm than good. Here’s how the state might better help news
“If there are resources to be put to work, we must ask where those resources should come from, who should receive them, and on what basis they should be distributed.”