Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Seeking “innovative,” “stable,” and “interested”: How The Markup and CalMatters matched up
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Sept. 28, 2016, 11:38 a.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: www.propublica.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   September 28, 2016

Facebook, the most-used social network in the world, is also one of the least understood.

A data juggernaut, Facebook has spent the better part of the last decade sucking up as much information about its users as possible — what they’ve liked, what websites they’ve visited, and even where they’ve shopped. What’s less clear is how Facebook uses that data to actually make decisions about which ads and other content it wants to show users.

What Facebook Thinks You Like, a new project from ProPublica, is trying to decode all of that. The tool, an extension for Google’s Chrome browser, let users see exactly what activities, brands and products Facebook, based on its data, thinks they like. The tool also tells users which — and how many — advertising categories those interests place them in.

While Facebook already freely offers this data to users, ProPublica says its goals are not only to figure out how Facebook uses user data in its algorithm, but also to get a better sense of how people actually feel about all of it. To that end, it’s working with WNYC’s Note to Self, which is asking readers to send in their reactions to using the tool.

The tool is the first release in a new four-part ProPublica series called Breaking the Black Box, which will take a deeper look at the inner workings and biases of the secret algorithms used by the big tech companies. The organization has already spent the better part of the past year reporting on the topic, most recently with a deep dive on how Amazon uses its pricing algorithm to give it an edge over the competition.

The results are sure to be eye-opening for the many Facebook users still unaware of the sophistication and scope of Facebook’s data collection and how it’s used to target ads. On the other hand, for lots of early users, ProPublica’s tool has shown that while Facebook collects plenty of data, its resulting conclusions are often comically off target (or comically specific).

ProPublica investigative reporter Julia Angwin appeared on WNYC’s Note to Self earlier today to talk about the project and ProPublica’s investigations.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Seeking “innovative,” “stable,” and “interested”: How The Markup and CalMatters matched up
Nonprofit news has seen an uptick in mergers, acquisitions, and other consolidations. CalMatters CEO Neil Chase still says “I don’t think we’ve seen enough yet.”
“Objectivity” in journalism is a tricky concept. What could replace it?
“For a long time, ‘objectivity’ packaged together many important ideas about truth and trust. American journalism has disowned that brand without offering a replacement.”
From shrimp Jesus to fake self-portraits, AI-generated images have become the latest form of social media spam
Within days of visiting the pages — and without commenting on, liking, or following any of the material — Facebook’s algorithm recommended reams of other AI-generated content.