News after advertising may look like news before advertising

“The link between advertising and news that has for so long provided so much of the money invested in professional journalism is coming apart.”

With accelerated decline in print advertising and an increasingly challenging digital advertising environment, we have to ask what news will look like after advertising.

rasmus-kleis-nielsenSince the rise of the penny press in the United States in the 1830s, advertising has been a central source of funding for journalism. Advertisers were never interested in the news; they were interested in audiences. And the populist penny papers could deliver audiences on a scale like no one else, just like radio and television would later offer large audiences that advertisers had few other ways of reaching. That’s why the advertisers flocked to them.

This meant that audiences did not have to pay the full cost of the content they consumed — advertisers paid a large part, funding cheap newspapers and free-to-air broadcasting. Sometimes audiences even enjoyed the advertising.

Today, advertisers have several other more efficient and cost-effective ways of reaching audiences online, and large parts of the audience do not enjoy the advertising. As a result, both advertisers and audiences are voting with their feet. And they are not voting for publishers.

Advertisers are voting with their feet for those that can offer advertising opportunities that are cheap, targeted, and easy to buy in bulk. That means Google, Facebook, and various programmatic advertising networks. Publishers benefit from some of this through platforms like Doubleclick, revenue sharing around Facebook Instant Articles, or in a few cases by building their own programmatic platforms the way Schibsted is doing. But the revenues they bring in are smaller than what their direct sales used to generate and less than what they had hoped digital advertising would generate.

Audiences are voting with their feet for ad-blocking when they browse via their desktop and for apps when on their smartphone, including platforms like Facebook that control the advertising formats, load, and infrastructure to minimize the hassle of the bloated advertising, endless prerolls, intrusive popups, etc. that plague much of the open web. People still seek out news and enjoy it when they come across it in more distributed environments. But they prefer to consume it in more convenient ways that are less lucrative for publishers than traditional on-site traffic with a heavy ad load on each page.

For advertisers and audiences, this is arguably a better world in many ways. For publishers, it is a very challenging environment.

A few big publishers will thrive as they are able to work with agencies and brands directly and offer them premium advertising (and increasingly sponsored content), attractive audiences, and exclusive environments, and do so at a scale that makes things easy for big advertisers and media buyers. (Some are still growing their digital advertising revenues. But many, including very large players like BuzzFeed and The Guardian, have had a harder 2016.)

But most publishers will struggle. Their direct sales are under pressure, their users are not logged in and thus hard to target effectively, and more and more of their inventory is likely to be sold through programmatic ad networks which combine often low CPMs with a situation where the networks take a large share. This is a problem for legacy and digital-born news media alike.

So the link between advertising and news that has for so long provided so much of the money invested in professional journalism is coming apart.

That is why publishers are working so hard to diversify their business models: away from legacy platforms and away from digital display advertising, with a much greater emphasis on digital subscriptions, sponsored content, events, services, business-to-business, you name it — anything, really, that can leverage the audience and reputation publishers still have, and build new revenue streams around it to make up for the legacy revenues that are disappearing, and the digital advertising revenues that are so hard to attract.

To understand what this means for journalism, what news might look like after advertising, it is worth considering what news looked like before advertising, before the rise of the penny press.

Some pre-advertising news media worked for business interests that needed specialized information and were willing to pay for it. Think of 19th-century versions of information services companies like Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters. This model does not depend on advertising.

Other pre-advertising news media worked for governments and political parties that wanted to influence public debate and were willing to pay for it. These were not simply partisan the way the (profitable) Daily Mail or Fox News are partisan, but news media that were run, often at a considerable loss, in large part for and by political actors — like Al Jazeera or Russia Today. This model too works without advertising.

Finally, some pre-advertising news media were parts of social movements that wanted to change the world. Abolitionists, religious reformers, trade unions, and many others would run movement media with a clear, activist commitment and keep them going with limited formal funding, #blacklivesmatters cranked out on a printing press. Again, this model does not depend on advertising.

All of these alternative models are likely to become relatively more important parts of our overall media environment, because all of them work without advertising. None of them will generate the billions of dollars in funding that advertising did, sustaining tens of thousands of jobs for journalists. All of them can support valuable journalism, but it will be kinds of journalism very different from that associated with 20th-century newspapers and broadcasters.

Advertising-supported journalism, in contrast, will continue to shrink as long as advertisers have more attractive opportunities than publishers and as long as audiences seek to avoid advertising. In most existing news media organizations, this development will mean continued revenue declines and cost cutting, combined with a heavy emphasis on diversification and finding new sources of revenue.

Beyond the job cuts, this presents journalists with a challenge and an opportunity.

The challenge is that a profession that has taken pride in its detachment from commercial considerations will increasingly be asked to be more directly involved in developing new potentially profitable products.

The opportunity is to rethink what value looks like when the business models underlying news production change. At end of the day, most journalists would probably rather work for their readers than for their advertisers.

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen is director of research at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University.

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Trushar Barot   API or die

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news