The battle for high-quality VR

“It’s time to acknowledge that your audience does not need to see your every stumble on the way to virtual reality greatness.”

To VR or not to VR — is that the question? Thanks to cheap and accessible technology, almost everyone is planning their first 360° video shoot and VR project. But is it really for everyone — and everything — every time?

stale-grutOver the past few years, the story of journalistic innovation has repeated itself: a new medium, function, or technology appears, and we experiment willingly. VR and 360° video are no different. Google, Facebook and Samsung are all big technology companies pushing it as the next big thing; media companies are enticed to supply their technology with the needed content. The New York Times is now producing a new 360° video every single day in partnership with Samsung.

But just because technology allows your audience to feel like the drinking fountain that Ai Weiwei drinks from — as demonstrated in one of their latest videos — should you do it? Remember that having a 360° camera can give you 359 more ways of making mistakes.

As Mike Isaac points out, technological innovation is often low risk for the tech companies, but a huge risk for publishers. Yet we act as if our lives depend on it. Just replace the technology, and what David Carr famously said upon receiving the first iPad in 2010 is just as apt for VR as we enter 2017: “Is that our bridge to the future? Or, oh wait, it’s a gallows!”

Let’s be honest: VR and 360° video are delightfully tricky. And as we all try to master this new medium, some obvious weaknesses have been uncovered, both in the medium and in us. Is it a waste of our time? What does it really take to make good VR?

After spending countless hours of watching VR and 360° content the last years, it strikes me that too many journalistic endeavors lack the key ingredients of good stories and good storytelling — which is quite an amazing feat for a profession built around the two.

With VR, we need to abandon almost everything we know about traditional media production. This is like video games. Or theatre. You’re now an audio guide at a museum, or Gyro Gearloose’s little helper.

We should use VR and 360° video as an opportunity to return to the core of our business: telling stories that need to be told, and showing places where they unfold in meaningful ways for more people.

It was only last year, when I vicariously joined Alexander Marquardt of ABC News in Syria, that I was convinced this technology could be worthwhile as a tool for journalism.

Ever since, I’ve been chasing a high that seems almost impossible to obtain again. One of the few contenders this year was Ben Solomon and The New York Times’ experience from the front lines in Iraq. It gave me a similar feeling of presence and understanding of the situation.

That initial rush to dive into VR now verges on parody. As more low-quality experiments are created and distributed to the public, the medium loses its power and the media loses its credibility. The story is lost when technology has taken its place.

That is why I would encourage more journalists and media organizations to take a look at how the BBC is approaching VR and 360° experiences. There’s a lot to learn, not just from their final products, but also in their underlying thinking.

Experiencing the story has been at the core of the BBC’s use of VR. They stress presence as a key to success. If you are in a forest, it’s about the wind in the trees, the cracking branches, and the trickling water.

This is not something you watch on TV; it’s something you experience. Something you remember happening to you. As a tool for journalism, to explain situations, stories and places, it could be second to none.

In my opinion, the BBC is far ahead of others here, despite only having released a small number of VR experiences and 360° videos to the public.

One reason is that they started out scrapping two out of three projects. As they went through the steps of figuring out the strengths of the medium before they released anything, the audience only got to see the products that had the requisite quality. With the bar already set high, and the likes of Facebook having hundreds of developers working on raising it higher, it’s time to acknowledge that your audience does not need to see your every stumble on the way to virtual reality greatness.

Notice the basic environment when Sir David Attenborough (who else?) makes you acquainted with a giant dinosaur. But make no mistake: It’s a high quality production with a lot of preparation, RED cameras, and a big crew.

Be sure you read up on their eight tips on producing VR before setting out to do it yourself next year.

They will also let you join refugees aboard a liferaft trying to cross the Mediterranean, in a similar fashion to what Planned Parenthood did when they allowed you to experience a journey to one of its clinics. Experiences like this actually embody the emotional capabilities of the new medium. Another fine example from the cold north is a 360° film on bullying from the Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company.

Thanks to newly found audio tapes, the BBC built a historic VR documentary around a soldier’s recollection of the Easter rebellion in Ireland. You play his part; the essence is that you being present is amplifying your understanding of a subject or a situation — just as Nonny de la Peña has recreated nonfiction narratives in VR for years.

For what its worth: The push from the technology companies will not make 2017 the year of VR, either. VR and 360° video will only go mainstream when people are starting to have great experiences and start to talk to each other about them. That is where journalism should play a pivotal role.

Ståle Grut is the acting editor of the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation’s R&D-lab, NRKbeta.

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Trushar Barot   API or die

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love