The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

“Where are the people getting their negative impressions of their new leader? They are getting them from the same press they say they do not trust.”

In September, eight weeks before the election, Gallup reported that trust in the nation’s news media has reached the lowest point since they began asking this question 44 years ago. The decline in trust, Gallup noted, has been more or less steady since 2005, although it greatly accelerated in 2016.

dick-tofelSince the election, journalists have been engaged in almost nonstop handwringing about the collapse in trust. To be candid, most seem astonished — but also almost affronted — that so much of the electorate chose Donald Trump after the avalanche of negative coverage he received. Surely, they seem to think, if the voters trusted us, they wouldn’t have voted for this man.

But there is another set of numbers worth considering as well. Here are a few examples: 20 percent of Trump voters, the exit polls report, had an unfavorable view of him. That’s 12 million people voting for a man they didn’t like. Fully 57 percent of white voters did not consider Trump honest or trustworthy. In other words, the explanation for the election result likely turned not so much on views of Trump, but on how broken many Americans believe our system to be, and on how desperate they are somehow to change it. (Also, on what many think of Hillary Clinton.)

And while many Americans are currently giving the president-elect the benefit of any doubts since his election, more are not. In eight polls taken since the election, Trump’s average of favorable views minus negative views is negative 4 percent. Bill Clinton, who was first elected with a smaller share of the popular vote than Trump (albeit in a three-candidate race), had net approval ratings around positive 30 percent at this point in 1992. Barack Obama, whose share of the popular vote was about seven points higher than Trump’s, had net approval ratings around positive 40 percent in 2008. In a survey taken in early December, 65 percent of respondents said they considered Trump to be “reckless.”

Justice Potter Stewart, in discussing Supreme Court rulings favorable to the press, once rhetorically asked a group of journalists, “Where do you think these rights came from? The stork didn’t bring them!” Similarly, where did voters get these views, and where are the people getting their negative impressions of their new leader?

They are getting them from the same press they say they do not trust.

I do not mean to minimize the problem of the trust gap: It is real, and it has important implications. Cable television, in particular, did a disgraceful job covering the campaign. Moreover, the trust gap is at least in part the result of a concerted campaign by Trump and others who share his politics, quite possibly aided and abetted by the Russian government, to undermine confidence in American journalism. This presents a serious threat in 2017, and likely beyond that.

But while concerned about trust, we need also to recognize that our fellow citizens are still listening to us as journalists, still reading, still watching, still learning from us — and that we need to redouble our own efforts to listen, and to learn from them.

The year ahead promises a time of well-reasoned fear for those of us in the news business. But fear should not give way to despair, nor should it cause us to soft-pedal the truth about our next president and his new administration.

Democratic governance in the United States is premised in part on the notion that if the people are kept informed by a vigorous press, they will ultimately choose wisely from among potential leaders. But such faith in long-term outcomes does not, and should not be taken to mean that all electoral judgments will be deemed wise by history. James Buchanan, Warren Harding, and Richard Nixon (twice) were all elected president.

Beyond that, while everyone prefers to be liked, admired, trusted, being liked is not our job as journalists.

Instead, that job, in the year ahead, is to continue to tell the truth about President Trump and all that comes with him, and to do this with special vigor when and if he challenges limits set by the Constitution. It is also to keep faith with the American people, believing that if we continue to listen to and inform them, they will, collectively, bring the country through, and perhaps even, thereby, have their own trust in the press somewhat restored.

Richard J. Tofel is president of ProPublica.

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Trushar Barot   API or die

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks