The Faustian Facebook dance continues

“What they are giving up in return may not be their souls, but it’s close enough.”

The rapidly evolving media world continues to undergo an unprecedented amount of upheaval, with mega-continents slamming into each other, vast chasms suddenly appearing under our feet, and glaciers melting at hyperspeed. But one thing remains largely unchanged, and that is the 800-pound gorilla whose shadow continues to loom over the landscape — a gorilla named Facebook.

mathew-ingramThe social network’s dominant position at the top of the media food chain is something most publishers have already become accustomed to, whether they like it or not. But that dominance was reinforced with the election of Donald Trump as the next president of the United States, an outcome that many believe Facebook played a role in, thanks to its distribution of so-called fake news.

This phenomenon was like a one-two punch to the solar plexus of the media industry. On the one hand, it drove home just how big a role Facebook plays in the news consumption of large numbers of people. But at the same time, it also made it abundantly clear how little the social network really cares about the news it distributes. So much power, and yet so little responsibility.

As one former Facebook staffer described it, all the network really cares about is whether users find the content in their feeds engaging or not, and “bullshit is highly engaging.” The question of whether or not the stories those users share are accurate or not is largely irrelevant.

Some sociologists argue that the way that Facebook is designed exacerbates the problem, because stories are shared by people we know or are connected with socially, and so they come with a veneer of trust. The site encourages people to share news stories because they make them feel a strong emotion, not because they are true or false. It’s like a giant machine for confirmation bias.

And so, media companies have to confront the reality that their fortunes — and in some cases, possibly even their survival — depend on a giant corporation whose interests may or may not even align with theirs.

This is the classic Faustian bargain, retold as a modern-media morality play. Like the original Faust, news publishers have been offered a deal by a charming stranger who promises he has their best interests at heart and that he’ll give them untold riches, in return for something they aren’t really using and probably won’t even miss when it’s gone. Who could say no?

In fact, it’s actually even worse than Faust’s deal. Faust chose to sign on the dotted line because he wanted extra features like wealth and power — but many media companies feel as though they have no choice but to cut a deal with Facebook, because they need the network’s reach and advertising revenue to survive.

What they are giving up in return may not be their souls, but it’s close enough. They’re trading their brand value and expertise for the pennies in advertising revenue that Facebook chooses to share with them, an arrangement that the social network can change at any moment. And what they could wind up losing is the trust of their readers — a currency that is already debased, but still arguably has some value left. For now.

My prediction is that this Faustian dance will continue in 2017, even as the downsides or holes in the deal start to become increasingly obvious. Some publishers will find that they’re spending lots of time and resources creating video for Facebook and not getting nearly enough in return. Some will have the terms of their deal renegotiated and will be powerless to stop it.

Unfortunately, for some, by the time this happens, it’ll already be too late. They will have become so dependent on Facebook that they will be trapped in a symbiotic relationship, and trying to remove the parasite will risk killing the host. And so they will continue, with Facebook gradually becoming stronger, as the news outlet becomes just another commodity provider of free content.

Is there a way of escaping this fate? Perhaps. Some media outlets are trying hard to make Facebook just one of many platforms and networks they take advantage of, while others are pursuing alternate ways of connecting with their audiences, rather than sacrificing everything they have in pursuit of reach. Maybe they will show the rest of the industry that it can be done, and that you can find a way to win even when you are trapped in a Faustian bargain.

Mathew Ingram is a senior writer at Fortune.

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Trushar Barot   API or die

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией