Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 10, 2017, 11 a.m.
Audience & Social
LINK: www.people-press.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   July 10, 2017

Just checking in again: There’s still a big partisan divide in the U.S. over what kind of impact the media has on the country.

85 percent of those who identify as Republicans (as well as the Republican-leaning) think the news media has a “negative effect on the way things are going in the country,” according to a Pew Research study released Monday that looked at perceptions of several national institutions, including the news media, colleges and universities, churches, labor unions, and financial institutions. That’s about the same percentage of Republicans last year who thought the news media had a negative impact on the country’s direction, though that’s up from 68 percent in 2010.

Democrats themselves are divided on their view of the news media’s impact on the country. But 44 percent see it as having a positive impact on the country, up from just 33 percent a year ago (46 percent say the news media negatively impacts the country).

Breaking that down further, 53 percent of Democrats with a college degree believe the news media has a “positive effect” on the country’s direction (a jump from last year when that was 31 percent; as well as two years ago, when it was 30 percent). Among Democrats without a college degree, the change is smaller: 40 percent think the news media has a “positive effect,” up from 34 percent in 2015.

Other institutions are seeing a similarly widening partisan divide; notably, colleges and universities:

58 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say colleges and universities negatively impact the country (last year, that number was 45 percent). 72 percent of Democrats and the Democratic-leaning say colleges and universities have a positive effect, a number that has mostly held steady in the past several years.

The full study is available here.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
Plus: How YouTubers spread far-right beliefs (don’t just blame algorithms), and another cry for less both-sides journalism.
Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring
We analyzed the data of groups as large as 40,000 members and as small as 300, from international organizations to local publishers. How does yours fit in?
Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section
“She wrote a fabulous piece that did incredibly well and I think there’s no way on earth that (a) she would have submitted or (b) it would have run, before we started this stuff. It got more than double the usual number of pageviews for an opinion piece.”