Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Welcome to GDPR: Here are the data privacy notices publishers are showing their Europe-based readers
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 17, 2017, 12:38 p.m.
LINK: www.buzzfeed.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   October 17, 2017

Facebook groups and campaigns. Twitter ads. Ads on YouTube, on Gmail. Promotions on Pokémon Go?! And now Outbrain, one of the companies responsible for those ubiquitous content recommendations no one ever thought they needed, is investigating whether Russia-linked groups purchased ads on its platform to somehow meddle in the 2016 U.S. elections, according to a BuzzFeed News report on Tuesday.

Outbrain is “currently conducting a thorough investigation specific to election tampering and continue[s] to monitor our index,” the company said in a statement to BuzzFeed News.

“The attempt to spread misinformation that impacts elections is obviously very concerning to us,” the Outbrain statement said. “Outbrain has been proactive in combating fake content in the past.”

“After a thorough investigation, Outbrain has found no evidence of bad actors using our platform to influence elections,” Outbrain CEO Yaron Galai said in a statement forwarded to Nieman Lab on Wednesday. “Given the seriousness of this issue and out of an abundance of caution, we proactively undertook this effort over the course of many weeks to ensure we got it right. Outbrain has always been dedicated to combating fake content, and we remain vigilant in fighting those who attempt to misuse our platform.”

Other similar ad networks like Taboola and RevContent told BuzzFeed on Tuesday they’ve seen no evidence of Russia-linked ad purchases.

These companies aren’t exactly beloved by users, but they drive enough revenue that some news organizations are keeping them around. Outbrain, for instance, claims its content reaches 550 million visitors each month, and its VP of product marketing claimed to The New York Times last year that the widget has become a “No. 1 revenue provider” for “major, major publishers.” A small number of publishers including Slate and The New Yorker dumped these networks last year, but major publishers from The Washington Post to ESPN continue to use these recommendation widgets that display bad clickbait — and misinformation — on their article pages (see: “Why Doctors Will No Longer Prescribe Blood Pressure Meds,” “Angelina Jolie’s Daughter Used to Be Cute. Now She Looks Insane”).

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Welcome to GDPR: Here are the data privacy notices publishers are showing their Europe-based readers
We’re seeing what publishers have decided to implement on their websites as of May 25 — whether they’ve decided to block European Union and European Economic Area-based traffic outright, set up buckets of consent for readers to click through, or done something simpler (or nothing new at all).
What is it that journalism studies is studying these days? A lot about newsrooms, less about everybody else in the news ecosystem
Also, has the “fake news” moment already passed for academics?
Is your fake news about immigrants or politicians? It all depends on where you live
Plus: Facebook is accepting proposals for fake news research, and fake news was growing as a topic of media discussion even before the U.S. presidential election.