The rise of skeptical reading

“Unlike technology, culture changes slowly. But when it does, the consequences of these changes stay for a long time.”

There is a quiet revolution in the making. It’s about how people make sense of the news. Barely perceptible amidst the loudness of commentary about bots, trolls, fake news, echo chambers, filter bubbles, confirmation bias, artificial intelligence, and so on is the realization that readers, listeners, viewers, and users are becoming ever more skeptical about the information they encounter in the news and social media. And that’s a good thing. Skepticism is a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition for the emergence of sustainable solutions regarding a potential state of misinformation marking contemporary politics and culture.

As far as media and journalism go, 2017 has been a transition year. Practitioners, analysts, and scholars have grappled with a collective sense that a fundamental dislocation has emerged in how the news are reported and distributed. While there is some consensus about a massive shift, there is much less certainty about what it exactly consists of, its causes, and its consequences. The initial cultural reflex has been a narrative about technological disruption of old conventions that have long governed the production and circulation of news, thus ushering a new regime of misinformation.

Often lost in this dystopian narrative is an account of how people make sense of an increasingly digitally created and curated new world of news. This, in turn, has led to an implicit overestimation of the power of technology and a parallel underestimation of the interpretive agency of news consumers. It would appear that readers of twenty-first century news can be more easily manipulated than those of the previous century. But are they? I suspect not. If anything, it might be the opposite.

For the past twelve months, my collaborators and I have been conducting in-depth interviews with a broad sample of consumers of news, entertainment, and technology. Among other things, we have asked them about issues such as fake news and trust in the information they see on the social media platforms they use and news media they consume on a regular basis. An account published previously on this site showed the existence of four mechanisms guiding people’s reading practices: strategic curation, mindful processing, emotional interpretation, and subjective attachment. What has emerged in conjunction with the combination of these mechanisms is a heightened degree of skepticism.

There is skepticism about the news media. For instance, one of the interviewees said that she is “concerned about the news programming. I think when I was younger I trusted it implicitly, which probably was not a good idea when I look back. But some of my trust and faith in the news and the news community is not what it was. I’m not trusting. I’m wondering what they’re leaving off.” Similar idea recurred in multiple interviews. “I think there has been a shift in the news and I feel like the news is not, no matter what you listen to, it’s not completely giving you both sides. It either gives you one way of looking at it and doesn’t really make you a critical thinker. I think that before, maybe you were getting news that was more critical thinking and you had to analyze if it’s correct or not correct…There is definitely been a shift in the news.”

There is also skepticism about the information that people see on social media. One person commented that on Facebook “it’s hard to decipher what’s real and what’s not. So, like, if I have just seen an article on Facebook, then I might go to the Internet and try to find that same headline. But I wouldn’t necessarily say that I would read it on Facebook.” Another interviewee added, “I’m very familiar with my friends’ posting habits and ignore three quarters of what’s on there because of that.”

How do people deal with this increased level of skepticism?

They are more mindful of the provenance and treatment of information. One of interviewees commented that she “started to pay attention to where the news is from because of fake news.” Others singled out specific sources. For instance, one commented “CNN used to have a fairly good reputation but they, too, report rumors without really confirming things and then they go back, maybe in the middle of a program, and retract what they said.” Similar patterns apply to social media: “I usually check things now that catch my eye so if I think it’s too dramatic to be true, I’ll look into it.”

They also check multiple sources. For instance, “I tend to look to see if the different political—just taking it from that point of view, then the different political view—or messaging sources converge, they both say, both agree on the same basic facts about something.” Finally, they use search engines to do their own fact-checking. “I don’t share news articles very often but if I do I probably try to read three or four articles on the topic. I’ve taking to generally Googling things just to try to get a concept of it.”

Taken together, these responses, combined with the overall skeptical stance, are the kernel of an ongoing revolution in interpretive practices. It is more quiet transformation than that of how technology has affected the production and distribution of information. But it is no less fundamental and likely more sustainable, since it has been shaping the cultural foundations of sensemaking. As such, it will be a key source of collective antibodies against the perils of misinformation.

By emerging organically from within the social fabric, these interpretive antibodies will be more durable than any technical fixes, and also a necessary complement to their possible efficacy. Unlike technology, culture changes slowly. But when it does, the consequences of these changes stay for a long time. So here’s to a 2018 full of skeptical readings of the news!

Pablo J. Boczkowski is a professor in the School of Communication at Northwestern University.

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

Errin Haines Whack   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Burt Herman   Things get real

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

Richard J. Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

Paul Ford   Go global

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

L. Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

An Xiao Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

Jake Levine   The return to now

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising