about  /   archives  /   contact  /   subscribe  /   twitter    
Share this entry
Make this entry better

What are we missing? Is there a key link we skipped, or a part of the story we got wrong?

Let us know — we’re counting on you to help Encyclo get better.

Put Encyclo on your site
Embed this Encyclo entry in your blog or webpage by copying this code into your HTML:

Key links:
Primary website:
en.wikipedia.org
Primary Twitter:
@wikipedia

Editor’s Note: Encyclo has not been regularly updated since August 2014, so information posted here is likely to be out of date and may be no longer accurate. It’s best used as a snapshot of the media landscape at that point in time.

Wikipedia is a web-based and collaborative encyclopedia project.

As of January 2012, Wikipedia has 20 million articles — more than 3.8 million of them in English — which have been written by volunteers from around the world. Almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site. Wikipedia’s tagline is “the free encyclopedia.”

Wikipedia was launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger and has become the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet. It began as a complement to Nupedia, an online encyclopedia project (its tagline was also “the free encyclopedia”) whose articles were written by experts — generally academics — and reviewed under a formal process. (While Wales is credited with the general idea of making a publicly editable encyclopedia, Sanger is usually credited the idea to use a wiki to reach that goal.)

Wikipedia was formally launched on January 15, 2001 through an announcement Sanger made to the Nupedia mailing list. There were initially relatively few rules about writing and editing articles, though Wikipedia’s “neutral point-of-view” policy — the ethos that guides its editorial process — developed quickly among its contributors.

Questions of accuracy

Though most see Wikipedia as a success story and a testament to the power of user-generated contributions and, more generally, the wisdom of crowds (Clay Shirky has called the project an “unplanned miracle”), some also accuse it of systemic bias and inconsistencies. They also challenge the project’s reliability and accuracy. One of the most famous inaccuracies occurred in 2005, when the journalist John Seigenthaler realized that his Wikipedia entry claimed that he had been a suspect in the assassinations of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. (In fact, he had been an aide and friend to Robert Kennedy.) The claim had been on his page for four months. Seigenthaler wrote a scathing op-ed in USA Today condemning Wikipedia for “character assassination,” leading to widespread questions about Wikipedia’s accuracy and authority.

After the incident, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales responded with his own USA Today op-ed, and updated Wikipedia policy to bar unregistered users from creating new articles.

When it comes to comparing Wikipedia’s content to traditional encyclopedias, though, there’s some evidence to suggest comparable accuracy. A 2005 investigation by the journal Nature found that the science articles in Wikipedia and those in the Encyclopedia Britannica had a similar rate of “serious errors.” (Brittanica has disputed those findings.) As the economist Tyler Cowen put it, “If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true, after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia.”

Wikipedia and journalism

Though Wikipedia remains controversial as a one-stop source for accurate information, it is increasingly being used not just as for reference material, but also for breaking-news updates. Increasingly, collaboratively created Wikipedia entries are doubling as real-time information aggregators in breaking-news situations.

Wikipedia has also been an inspiration for a more contextualized approach to news narrative. News outlets’ topic pages take advantage of the public desire for evergreen reference content that Wikipedia has demonstrated. In 2008, news theorist Matt Thompson proposed the creation of context-rich journalism stories by “Wikipedia-ing the News.”

Peers, allies, & competitors:
Recent Nieman Lab coverage:
Sept. 8, 2022 / Masha Borak
Doxxed, threatened, and arrested: Russia’s war on Wikipedia editors — One Friday in March, not long after Russia invaded Ukraine, Mikhail, a Russia-based Wikipedia editor, opened the Telegram app to discover that he had been doxxed. His personal information, including his name and social m...
Oct. 30, 2020 / Laura Hazard Owen
Two new studies show, again, that Facebook doesn’t censor conservatives — “Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions than left-leaning or ideologically nonaligned pages.” Conservatives have long complained that their views are censored on Facebook. Republican Sen. Mik...
Dec. 12, 2019 / Christine Schmidt
This is how Report for America ended up funding a community Wikipedia editor (!) at a library (!!) — When Report for America announced last week that it was placing 250 journalists into 164 local newsrooms, the list of beats they’d be covering didn’t seem too out of the ordinary. It served as a sort of non-c...
Oct. 24, 2018 / Joshua Benton
WikiTribune is handing the keys more completely to its users (after laying off its journalists) — We’ve written a few times about WikiTribune, the Jimmy Wales-founded for-profit news site that aims to merge the bottom-up authority structure of Wikipedia with the top-down authority structure of traditional journ...
July 4, 2018 / Spencer Turcotte
Tell me more: The Globe and Mail is slipping a little extra context into its stories (while explaining its editorial thinking along the way) — The Canadian national daily The Globe and Mail is testing a new feature that could enhance readers’ understanding of its online stories — and of the mechanics of its journalism. Susan Krashinsky Robertson, normal...

Recently around the web, from Mediagazer:

Primary author: Megan Garber. Main text last updated: January 5, 2012.
Make this entry better
How could this entry improve? What's missing, unclear, or wrong?
Name (optional)
Email (optional)
Explore: Politico
Politico logo

Politico is a Washington-based website and newspaper that focuses on American politics. Politico was founded in 2007 and is owned by Allbritton Communications, a media company that also owns eight television stations, the New York local news site Capital New York, and, briefly, the defunct Washington-based local news website TBD. As of mid-2013, it had…

Put Encyclo on your site
Embed this Encyclo entry in your blog or webpage by copying this code into your HTML:

Encyclo is made possible by a grant from the Knight Foundation.
The Nieman Journalism Lab is a collaborative attempt to figure out how quality journalism can survive and thrive in the Internet age.
Some rights reserved. Copyright information »