The BBC functions as a heat sink for polarization — converting potentially dangerous energy into something the system can more easily deal with. A new group of broadcast competitors and its likely new set of bosses see it differently.
A new study of The Independent’s 2016 shift to online-only finds that its print readership didn’t move to digital when the newspaper did. It’s now “more glanced at, it seems, than gorged on.”
An analysis from City University London confirms that women are poorly represented among British bylines, particularly in coverage of politics and sports and in commentary.
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: British papers fight new regulations, and Pew’s (mostly) dire look at news." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 22 Mar. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2024.
APA
Coddington, M. (2013, Mar. 22). This Week in Review: British papers fight new regulations, and Pew’s (mostly) dire look at news. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/03/this-week-in-review-british-papers-fight-new-regulations-and-pews-mostly-dire-look-at-news/
Chicago
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: British papers fight new regulations, and Pew’s (mostly) dire look at news." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified March 22, 2013. Accessed April 17, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/03/this-week-in-review-british-papers-fight-new-regulations-and-pews-mostly-dire-look-at-news/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/03/this-week-in-review-british-papers-fight-new-regulations-and-pews-mostly-dire-look-at-news/
| title = This Week in Review: British papers fight new regulations, and Pew’s (mostly) dire look at news
| last = Coddington
| first = Mark
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 22 March 2013
| accessdate = 17 April 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Coddington|2013}}
}}
