Two academics from NYU worry that the old binary system — a court document is either public or it’s not — doesn’t mesh well with a searchable online context, and that protecting access might mean rethinking it.
Plus: The Manti Te’o hoax, The Atlantic’s botched Scientology advertorial, a check on CNET’s editorial independence, and the rest of the week’s media/tech news.
Plus: The fallout from one newspaper’s publication of gun-permit data, the NYT’s Snow Fall and multimedia journalism, and the rest of the week’s media news.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: Andrew Sullivan’s bold paid-content plan, and Al Jazeera’s play for the U.S.." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 7 Jan. 2013. Web. 25 Apr. 2024.
APA
Coddington, M. (2013, Jan. 7). This Week in Review: Andrew Sullivan’s bold paid-content plan, and Al Jazeera’s play for the U.S.. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved April 25, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/01/this-week-in-review-andrew-sullivans-bold-paid-content-plan-and-al-jazeeras-play-for-the-u-s/
Chicago
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: Andrew Sullivan’s bold paid-content plan, and Al Jazeera’s play for the U.S.." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified January 7, 2013. Accessed April 25, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/01/this-week-in-review-andrew-sullivans-bold-paid-content-plan-and-al-jazeeras-play-for-the-u-s/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/01/this-week-in-review-andrew-sullivans-bold-paid-content-plan-and-al-jazeeras-play-for-the-u-s/
| title = This Week in Review: Andrew Sullivan’s bold paid-content plan, and Al Jazeera’s play for the U.S.
| last = Coddington
| first = Mark
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 7 January 2013
| accessdate = 25 April 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Coddington|2013}}
}}
