<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nieman Journalism Lab &#187; registration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niemanlab.org/tag/registration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niemanlab.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google News embraces self-identification of content</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/11/google-news-embraces-self-identification-of-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/11/google-news-embraces-self-identification-of-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Zachary M. Seward</author>
				<category><![CDATA[Small post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitemap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user generated content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=10575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some online-only news organizations were upset when Google News began attaching a &#8220;(blog)&#8221; label to their content two months ago. Others, like me, complained the label was outdated and inconsistently applied.
Now Google News is asking publishers to label themselves. In an update to its ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some online-only news organizations were upset when Google News began attaching a &#8220;(blog)&#8221; label to their content two months ago. Others, <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/10/the-strange-case-of-google-news-and-its-blog-label/">like me</a>, complained the label was outdated and inconsistently applied.</p>
<p>Now Google News is asking publishers to label themselves. In an update to its <a href="update to its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_map">sitemap</a> standards <a href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-face-to-google-news-sitemaps.html">announced</a> today, Google News is requesting that publishers explicitly tag content that&#8217;s published on a blog. Same goes for press releases, satire, opinion, user-generated content, and any articles that require registration or payment to read. The technical details are <a href="http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?answer=93992">here</a>.</p>
<p>Most of those labels will be visible to users of Google News, as they are now. Opinion and user-generated content won&#8217;t get a label but will presumably affect search results. And while tagging is voluntary, Google reserves the right to &#8220;add such designations to certain articles as necessary.&#8221;</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t see why it matters if news is published on a blog or some other platform. (Google CEO Eric Schmidt <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/11/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-envisions-the-news-consumer-of-the-future/">ventured a distinction</a> yesterday.) But allowing publishers to self-identify their content is a big improvement that should resolve most of the complaints Google News has been hearing  — and which have been voiced to me in private. It&#8217;s a small issue with much bigger implications for how we consume, sort, and, yes, identify news in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/11/google-news-embraces-self-identification-of-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registration down, RSS ads still rare on big U.S. newspaper sites</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/12/registration-down-rss-ads-rare-on-big-us-newspaper-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/12/registration-down-rss-ads-rare-on-big-us-newspaper-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Zachary M. Seward</author>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niemanlab.org/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper websites became a whole lot easier to read in 2008. Just 11 of the top 100 American newspapers require readers to register with a username, password, and other data before viewing at least some content, according to a new survey by The Bivings Group. That&#8217;s down from 29 newspaper sites in 2007.
The changes may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper websites became a whole lot easier to read in 2008. Just 11 of the top 100 American newspapers require readers to register with a username, password, and other data before viewing at least some content, according to a <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2008/the-use-of-the-internet-by-americas-largest-newspapers-2008-edition/">new survey by The Bivings Group</a>. That&#8217;s down from 29 newspaper sites in 2007.</p>
<p>The changes may have gone unnoticed because 4 of the top 10 newspapers &#8212; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us">The Wall Street Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">Washington Post</a>, and <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/">Arizona Republic</a> &#8212; still require some form of registration on their websites. (Oddly, Bivings ranks newspapers by print circulation. While the Republic is 10th in print, it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003891678">22nd in web traffic</a>. Maybe because the paper compels its readers to <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/members/Register">register</a> before they can leave comments on the site?)</p>
<p>Registration can be useful in customizing websites and collecting data for advertisers, but users mostly <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/11/10/save-time-website-registration-profiles/">just find it annoying</a>. Newspaper sites once embraced the technique, and registration actually rose from 23 of the top 100 in 2006 to 29 in 2007, according to Bivings. That trend appears to have completely reversed itself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/study-newspaper-websites-are-still-figuring-out-this-whole-conversation-thing/">TechCrunch</a> and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/study-newspaper-websites-are-still-figuring-out-this-whole-conversation-thing/">ReadWriteWeb</a> have already posted quality summaries of the report, and you can read the <a href="http://www.bivings.com/thelab/presentations/2008study.pdf">full, 28-page PDF here</a>. </p>
<p>Pretty much everything you need to know, however, is found <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/resources/2007v2008.gif">in this chart</a>. Video is universal, podcasting is waning, and mobile is on the rise &#8212; just like the rest of the web. Newspaper sites have also largely embraced comments (75 of the top 100) and bookmarking sites like <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a> and <a href="http://delicious.com/">Delicious</a> (92). </p>
<p>One web trend that didn&#8217;t extend to newspapers in 2008 is advertising on RSS feeds &#8212; which <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/10/65347">isn&#8217;t new</a> but went mainstream in the last two years as <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/regarding_df_feed">several</a> <a href="http://kottke.org/08/10/seeking-kottkeorg-rss-feed-sponsors">popular</a> websites began running ads in their feeds. Google&#8217;s Feedburner service <a href="http://blogs.feedburner.com/feedburner/archives/2008/05/into_the_wild_adsense_for_feed_1.php">began offering ads</a> this year as well.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.niemanlab.org/images/waporssad.png" width="500" height="208" /><br />
<br />
Still, just one newspaper site in the top 100 runs advertising on its RSS feeds, according to Bivings. I can&#8217;t confirm that it&#8217;s truly just one, but if so, it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/">The Washington Post</a>, which runs unobtrusive Google ads on some items in its <a href="http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/24/LI2005032400102_xml">main feed</a>. They&#8217;re not particularly useful but not annoying, either, and it&#8217;s a little bit of extra revenue for the Post Company. Seems like a no-brainer for other newspapers to follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.niemanlab.org/2008/12/registration-down-rss-ads-rare-on-big-us-newspaper-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
