Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
This is what it’s like to be a media company’s first-ever online safety editor
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
May 13, 2013, 1:05 p.m.
LINK: www.washingtonpost.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   May 13, 2013

Neil Irwin at WaPo’s Wonkblog looks at what the Bloomberg snooping scandal/”scandal” says about the media business:

You can’t think about Bloomberg News without understanding that this is the ecosystem in which it exists. The journalists there create some excellent work on topics that have nothing to do with financial markets — but their bread and butter, their raison d’etre is to be one more thing that makes the Bloomberg terminal something that financial professionals can’t afford not to have…

Which brings us back to the events of the last few days. The practice of letting journalists access information about when subscribers had logged in and what broad categories of data they accessed pits the two imperatives of Bloomberg’s strategy against each other. On the one hand, it wants to do everything it can to ensure that its reporters are drumming up information that the competition isn’t. On the other, anything that discomfits the subscribers who are paying the bills could endanger the whole enterprise.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
This is what it’s like to be a media company’s first-ever online safety editor
“What’s really struck me is the variety of issues I’ve seen reported in recent weeks. Not one of them has been the same.”
Fact-checking may be important, but it won’t help Americans learn to disagree better
“The more that a study looked like the real world, the less fact-checking changed participants’ minds.”
Can U.S. journalism truly serve global audiences? Not if it treats them like an afterthought
What would a truly global media company look like?