It was Ray Bradbury that said predicting the future was easy. You just look around and predict more of the same. But he wasn’t having it.
“To hell with more,” he wrote, “I want better.”
In the area of digital media literacy education, the “more” prediction is easy. There will be more of it. States, provinces, and countries will begin to roll out larger programs. People will be hired. Initiatives will be funded. Consultants will be engaged and new programs designed. Edtech startups, lurching out of recent personalized education failures, will sense money to be extracted from the public purse and pitch last year’s wares with a brand new pivot. 2016’s coding microcredential platform will become 2018’s information literacy solution.
There will be 32 headlines that claim a newly funded company has “solved the information literacy problem,” all dutifully transcribed from the latest Y Combinator press releases. They will use the term “fake news.” The irony of this will be lost on both startup and tech press transcriber.
So that’s the more. But what about the better?
Lost initially in the mad rush to monetize the most recent crisis will be the fact that underneath the new coat of paint many of these solutions are decades old. That’s fine, of course, if it turns out these solutions help folks make sense of the web. Maybe the failure of them is due just to underuse. It could be.
Me, I’m skeptical. I’ve been involved in online literacy for a decade and I’m not convinced “more” does it. Recent studies seem to support this conclusion, finding that an awful lot of highly educated folks, skilled in all sorts of traditional media literacy, are hopelessly lost on the web. (Many of these people are faculty).
Given this, 2018 could be the year that we refactor media literacy, bringing the insights of people with teaching experience together with experts on the current information environment and people (such as fact-checkers) that most closely model target competencies. This project would start by asking what a citizen needs to be able to do online, and what skills, understandings, and dispositions they need to do it. It’d work backwards from there, tapping into the insights of the newly thriving interdisciplinary field of misinformation. It’d make something new, and suited to the purpose in front of us.
Far-fetched? Maybe. But media literacy has always been crisis-driven, and has undergone major revisions to address perceived threats before. The interdisciplinary collaboration that we see the misinformation field currently engaging in is inspiring, and provides a possible model. This could be the year.
Don’t bet on that of course. Always, always, bet on more. But put your heart and soul into achieving better.
One other prediction, on the rise of the right to be informed.
In our mental model of tyranny, Orwell’s 1984 has an outsized influence. The government chirps its preferred narrative repeatedly at the people, monitors their acceptance of it, maintains the only historical record, and bends history and perception to its centralized will. Orwell’s “boot stamping on a face — forever” is always government-issue footwear, the make and shoe size clearly visible.
In Orwell’s world, and indeed in the world of many past totalitarian regimes, the right to speak and the right to be informed — the ability to hear views outside of what the government provided — were inextricably intertwined. The government had monopoly power over narrative, which it both exercised (keeping the population uninformed) and protected (preventing expression of divergent views). Our society, always set up to fight the last war, has tended to see these rights as intertwined.
This model, however, is outdated. Modern totalitarian regimes do not exercise monopoly control over narrative. Rather, they use a variety of technological and organic means to make competing narratives inaccessible to or untrusted by the public. They leverage the use of “patriotic trolling,” as seen in the Philippines, and armies of paid commenters and fake profiles leveraging real participation. In the U.S., the hordes of bots and people who talk like bots invade competing hashtags and disrupt political communication. Weaponized transparency, defended by free speech advocates, is used to overwhelm the public’s capacity to separate fact from fiction, as we saw with the Podesta email “leaks.” Speech — whether automated or organized — is being used strategically to prevent access to information the public needs to govern itself.
In such a world, we will start to see people, out of necessity, peel apart the right to free speech from the right to be informed. The right to be informed will need to take into account, as Zeynep Tufekci has argued, the limits of attention and the way bad information can be used to crowd out good. It will take into account the deleterious effects of information overload, and wrestle with the impact of systemic harassment in wiping out minority voices. This evolved conception of free speech as a right to expression that sometimes conflicts with a parallel right to be informed will begin to form a legal, technical, and educational framework which is better able to defend against the tyranny face instead of the tyranny we remember.
Mike Caulfield heads the Digital Polarization Initiative at the American Democracy Project.
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age