Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Winter may be coming for HBO’s streaming subscriptions, but it doesn’t have to for your news organization
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Sept. 20, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

Only 43 percent of Americans find it easy to distinguish opinion from news on digital news sites or social media, according to a survey from the American Press Institute. But the job gets easier when they’re consuming media from publications they’re most familiar with.

Earlier this year, API asked Americans about their relationship with the news media, polling both the public about journalists and journalists about the public. (A separate study from Pew Research earlier this month found that 57 percent of American social media users expect the news on social media to be inaccurate.) Building off that work, API pulled out these stats about sorting opinion and news on different platforms:

  • 55 percent of Americans say it’s easy to recognize news from opinion in news media in general.
  • Americans find it easiest to distinguish on local TV news (63 percent say it’s easy to recognize news from opinion there); social media and online-only news websites rank last, with 43 percent saying it’s easy for each one. 32 percent say it’s at least somewhat difficult to distinguish news from opinion on social media
  • Talk radio is the sole platform at the 50 percent threshold. Public radio is at 47 percent finding it easy (though it also has the largest percent who say it is “neither difficult nor easy”, at 34 percent).
  • Americans find it easier to separate news and opinion in their local newspapers (55 percent) than in national newspapers (47 percent).

Journalism jargon doesn’t help. (I doubt I am the only one who received a “stupid question: What’s an op-ed?” message in the flurry of the anonymous New York Times op-ed.) This chart shows the percentages of “yes” responses when asked, “How familiar are you which each term of concept?”

And 63 percent of respondents said “news is most useful when it mostly reports facts with some background or analysis”:

That means people want news with some context or background — more than just facts — but many think what they’re seeing has veered too much toward opinion. This finding, coupled with the fact that people have a hard time making distinctions, is another indicator of a problem.

You can read the full report, with suggestions for steps to take and examples of news organizations that help to dispel confusion, here.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Winter may be coming for HBO’s streaming subscriptions, but it doesn’t have to for your news organization
On the care and feeding of subscribers — and what happens when the thing they originally signed up for goes away.
The 016, a social network for Worcester, seeks to become a “delivery boy and booster” for local media
“You can create the best journalism, but if you can’t get it to an audience, this is a problem.”
This is how an Iranian network created a “disinformation supply chain” to spread fake news
Plus: Whether Americans believe climate change is caused by humans depends on how you ask the question, and WhatsApp clones are getting around some restrictions designed to limit the spread of fake news.