2
0
1
9

Unlocking the commons

“The most powerful and interesting media model will remain raising money from members who don’t just permit but insist that the product be given away for free.”

For the last year, I’ve written a newsletter for Kottke.org, one of the last of the independent blogs still going. It’s funded by site memberships that support the main site and all of its subprojects, and by my personal Patreon. There is no paywall. Everything at Kottke.org is free for members and non-members alike.

Here’s the picture as generally agreed upon: Ads are still alive and well, but the collapse and consolidation of the ad market means ads alone can’t support media companies anymore, whether they’re big like The New York Times or small like Kottke.org.

There’s a puritanical argument that says ads have failed media — they bring out media’s worse impulses and might be inherently bad. The only way to break with the ad model is to break with it completely and sell media like a product. Make readers pay for content. If they don’t pay for it, don’t give it to them. Only when media companies are wholly accountable to their subscribers can you fix what’s wrong with media. Big companies need paywalls; little ones need exclusive subscribers.

Kottke.org, obviously, does not work this way. It has ads, although those are a very small part of the site and a shrinking part of the revenue. It has members, but very, very little is directed only to them; right now, they get some behind-the-scenes stuff and a few early previews and experiments. Stuff that only real fans even want. The site, the tweets, the RSS feed, and everything else the site’s produced or ever will produce is available to everyone whether they’re a member or not.

I call this “unlocking the commons,” and it’s the same approach I’ve taken with my Patreon and newsletter. Fans support the person and the work. But it’s not a transaction, a fee for service. It’s a contribution that benefits everyone. Free-riders aren’t just welcome; free-riding is the point. This, I think, is key to understanding the psychology of patronage.

Let’s say you’re buying a book. Books aren’t perfect commodities, but they’re still commodities. As a shopper, you’re trying to get as much value for your book as you can for your money. If I can get the book cheaper and faster from retailer A(mazon) than retailer B(arnes & Noble), most of the time, that’s what I’m going to do.

If I’m skeptical of A, and prefer to support B or C(ity bookstore of my choice), I’m not strictly speaking in a purchasing relationship anymore, but something closer to a patronage one. I don’t just want my money to buy an object; I want it to support institutions and individuals I like, and I want it to support the common good.

This is one of the weird things about patronage. As a consumer, your first thought is to your own benefit. As a patron, it’s to the good of your beneficiary. Likewise, as an artisan supported by patronage, you tend to think more about what’s best for your patrons and audience than you do yourself.

For instance, when Patreon changed its fee structure in 2017, I thought about it on two levels. First, it seemed really bad for patrons, slightly less bad for beneficiaries, and clearly helped out Patreon more than either group. As a customer of Patreon — they’re the ones I give my money to — I felt like I was being ripped off. I was being asked for more money without getting more in return. But as a patron, my first thought was: Does this help the people I pledge money to each month? And as a beneficiary, I thought: How does this affect the people who pledge money to me?

In both cases, I wanted what was best for that other person. I wanted them to be getting the full value of the transaction. The only time it was about me was when I thought about my relationship with Patreon — which is completely different.

Please note that this is not fuzzy-headed idealism or just sentiment: This is as concrete and comprehensive as it gets. It’s economic thinking that recognizes that goods don’t just exist to be used up, but are objects of labor produced by and for members of a commonwealth. The truth of the transaction is in the whole.

The most economically powerful thing you can do is to buy something for your own enjoyment that also improves the world. This has always been the value proposition of journalism and art. It’s a nonexclusive good that’s best enjoyed nonexclusively.

Anyways. This is a prediction for 2019 and beyond: The most powerful and interesting media model will remain raising money from members who don’t just permit but insist that the product be given away for free. The value comes not just what they’re buying, but who they’re buying it from and who gets to enjoy it.

The bigger those two pools get — the bigger the membership, and the bigger the audience — the better it gets for everyone. This is why we need more tools, so more people can try to do it. PBS as a service.

Now, I’m not so sure how this works when applied to enormous venture-funded or shareholder-governed sites like BuzzFeed or The Guardian. Those ventures have inherently different dynamics at play and different stakeholders to answer to. But for independent sites like ours, I think it’s the only model that makes sense — that goes with the grain of the web, rather than fighting it by trying to lock everything down in a ransom model or bet on some third-party savior to come through with funding. Readers and writers, working together at personal scale: That’s the only way this all makes sense.

It’s not quite socialized art. Mutualist art, maybe. Proudhon probably would have thought it was pretty cool. So would the Florentines, arch-capitalists as they were. And it might not work. But so far, it’s the only model I’ve found worth trying.

Tim Carmody writes the weekly newsletter Noticing on Kottke.org, where an earlier version of this prediction appeared.

Michael Rain   The year of the culturally relevant curator

Eric Nuzum   The year of the DIY podcast network

Hossein Derakhshan   The news is dying, but journalism will not — and should not

Simon Galperin   After capitalism’s fire, journalism’s secondary succession

Seth C. Lewis   The gap between journalism and research is too wide

Tamar Charney   Seriously: What do you do for people?

Almar Latour   Reported facts, weaponized in service of action

Gideon Lichfield   Goodbye attention economy, we’ll miss you

Ernie Smith   The year we step back from the platform

Soo Oh   Just showing our work isn’t enough

Tim Carmody   Unlocking the commons

Rishad Patel   A design system for responsible publishing

Kelsey Proud   Journalism becomes the escape

M. Scott Havens   Time to swing for the fences

Jack Riley   Facebook refugees, from ad revenue to news habits

A.J. Bauer   The coming splintering of conservative media

Angèle Christin   Algorithms and the reflexive turn

Logan Molyneux   Seeing social media for what it is

Elizabeth Jensen   Going where the Acela can’t take you

John Garrett   You can’t raise prices forever

Dave Burdick   Seeing our blind spots

Glyn Mottershead and Martin Chorley   When a tech company pulls the plug on your story

Thomas Hanitzsch   The rise of tribal journalism

Dheerja Kaur   A focus on problems, not platforms

Raney Aronson-Rath   We learn “digital” doesn’t have to mean “short”

Zizi Papacharissi   Old interface, say hello to the new interface

Alyssa Zeisler   We expand what (and how and who) we serve

Jim Friedlich   Meet Citizen Kane 2.0

Taylor Lorenz   Personal branding is more powerful than ever

Peter Bale   Venture capital runs out of patience

Rachel Glickhouse   Newsrooms will prioritize audience needs

Adam B. Ellick   Video forensic reporting goes mainstream — and local

Efrat Nechushtai   Journalism wants to be your friend, not your teacher

Nisha Chittal   The homepage makes a comeback

Zuzanna Ziomecka   News leadership gets an overdue upgrade

Masuma Ahuja   Make foreign coverage less foreign

Tshepo Tshabalala   Ahead of African elections, unlock partnerships with fact-checkers

Robin Kwong   Tech shouldn’t be the only field pollinating “news nerds”

Robert Hernandez   Racists and sexists get replaced

Chase Davis   We can acknowledge what we don’t know

Carolina Guerrero   Spanish-language audio blows up

Lauren Katz   Community becomes a core newsroom value

Claire Wardle   Forget deepfakes: Misinformation is showing up in our most personal online spaces

Rick Berke   The year of loyalty

Geetika Rudra   The year of actionable (local) journalism

Renée Kaplan   Our future could lie within our own organizations

Ståle Grut   A new dawn for 3D tech in journalism

Manoush Zomorodi   Tech will do for information overload what it did for mindfulness

Matt Skibinski   Quality and reliability are the new currencies for publishers

Mandy Velez   Putting the social back in social media

Colleen Shalby   Representation becomes more than a talking point

Kristen Muller   Local news fails — in a good way

Mariana Moura Santos   From pageviews to impact

Becca Aaronson   From bridge roles to product thinkers

Mandy Jenkins   Fight the urge to run away from social media

John Saroff   The pivot to reader revenue’s unintended consequences

Stefanie Murray   Local news wakes up and starts collaborating

Heba Aly   The rise of international nonprofit news

Eric Ulken   The year you actually start to like your CMS

Ruth Palmer and Benjamin Toff   From news fatigue to news avoidance

Angilee Shah   The year news orgs say “yes” to real leaders

Bill Adair   Another year fighting Trump’s falsehoods

Whitney Phillips   Our information systems aren’t broken — they’re working as intended

Sarah Alvarez   Simplify and redistribute

Umbreen Bhatti   The story doesn’t end for the people we quote

Knight Foundation   A year of local collaboration

Joel Konopo   Influencers become the new liberated power in Africa

Amy King   We should listen to the kids (especially on Instagram)

Mike Caulfield   Ditch the media literacy cynicism and get to work

Emma Carew Grovum   The year of the loyal reader

Gabriel Snyder   Journalism doesn’t fit well in a funnel

Greg Emerson   Power to the user

Cindy Royal   For journalism curriculum to change, its faculty needs disruption

Winny de Jong   Data journalism goes undercover

Jenée Desmond-Harris   It finally sinks in that some people aren’t white

Sarah Stonbely   Mapping the local news ecosystem — with scale but detail

Zainab Khan   Publishers whose products can stand up to social media giants will win

Darryl Holliday   Let’s talk about power (yours)

Mike Rispoli and Craig Aaron   Government funds local news — and that’s a good thing

Brian Moritz   The subscription-pocalypse is about to hit

Sue Cross   Return of the water cooler

Marie Shanahan   Newsrooms take the comments sections back from platforms

Elisabeth Goodridge   Yes, they signed up — but our job’s not over

Alexandra Svokos   Good luck convincing us millennials to pay

LaToya Drake   Listen up: New stories, new storytellers

Talia Stroud   Engaging people across lines of difference

Nathalie Malinarich   Video — yes, video

Sarah Marshall   A return to destination journalism

Peter Cunliffe-Jones   The focus of misinformation debates shifts south

Jesse Holcomb   We’ll get better at making the case for local journalism

Joanne McNeil   Building a digital hospice

Ole Reißmann   The rise of vertical storytelling

Borja Bergareche Sainz de los Terreros   Entering a more balanced era

Alexis Lloyd & Matt Boggie   The year product leads media

Tyler Fisher   This is journalism’s do-or-die moment

Axie Navas   The traffic hunt, CMS battle, and magazine identity crises loom

John Biewen   Podcasts keep getting better

Moreno Cruz Osório   Damaged credibility and a new threat in Brazil

Salem Solomon   Correcting our corrections

Tushar Banerjee   Interactive ads will be the new face of display advertising

Carl Bialik   Fatigued news consumers will pay more for less news

Jonathan Stray   More algorithmic accountability reporting, and a lot of it will be meh

Josh Schwartz   A pullback from platforms and a focus on product

Millie Tran   There is no magic — you’ve got this

Rubina Madan Fillion   Fighting the reality of deepfakes

Annie Rudd   A more intimate aesthetic of politics — on Insta

Steve Myers   From trying to cover it all to covering what matters

Heather Bryant   We are responsible for how we use our power

Matt Karolian   Publishers come to terms with being Facebook’s enablers

Cătălina Albeanu   Being responsible for what we don’t know

Cristi Hegranes   A year to invest in the security of local journalists

Monique Judge   Committing to the truth, calling out lies

Carrie Brown-Smith   Advocating a healthy civic life is no journalistic crime

Francesco Zaffarano   Towards a rethinking of journalism on social media

Laura E. Davis   More access, but not that kind

Kjerstin Thorson   Time to get mad about information inequality (again)

Nico Gendron   Reaching Generation Z beyond the coasts

Jean Friedman Rudovsky   Cross-newsroom collaborations strengthen communities

Candis Callison   Learn from Indigenous journalists on covering climate change

Jonathan Gill   Publishers build a common tech platform together

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Local news isn’t where you thought it was

Frank Mungeam   Tonight at 11: News, sports, and climate change

Julia Rubin   Meeting people where they are

Bill Grueskin   Toward a symphony model for local news

Matthew Pressman   The battle over objectivity intensifies

Cory Bergman   Journalism as a technology service

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting is media’s slow food movement

Jesse Brown   Canada’s subsidy for news backfires

Jonas Kaiser   Catching up with “Neuland”

Jeff Chin   We detox from Chartbeat

Reyhan Harmanci   Selling more stories to Hollywood

Andrea Faye Hart   Doing less harm, not just more good

Jennifer Dargan   You don’t build diversity through one-off training sessions

Frank Chimero   Leave the phone at home and put news on your wrist

An Xiao Mina   The death of consensus, not the death of truth

Johannes Klingebiel   We all grow hooves

Kawandeep Virdee   Media wants to take care of you

james Wahutu   Think 2018 was bad? Wait until you see 2019

Rebecca Searles   From silos to Swiss Army knife teams

Jared Newman   AI-generated fakes launch a software arms race

Heather Chaplin   Agree we’re partisan — for the democratic system

Dan Shanoff   Bet on sports gambling

Kevin Douglas Grant   A year to embrace journalism as public service

Ben Werdmuller   The platform tide is turning

Andrew Ramsammy   The great re-pivot to audio

Stephanie Edgerly   It’s time to understand the un-audience

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Readers are only getting started

Julie Posetti   The year of the fight back

Nikki Usher   Three ways national media will further undermine trust

Francesco Marconi   The year of iterative journalism

Meredith Artley   Huge demand for…anything but politics

Errin Haines Whack   Say it with me: Racism

Adam Thomas   In Europe, foundations invest in news

Nicholas Jackson   More transparency around newsroom decisions

P. Kim Bui   The misfits become the bosses

Ariel Zirulnick   Participation gets professional

Andrew Donohue   Voting rights becomes the new climate change

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   A more sincere definition of “community”

Hearken   Pivot to people

Ben Smith   The pendulum starts to swing back

Sue Robinson   Reporters go on the offensive

Mario García   The rise of content “pilots”

Rachel Davis Mersey   Local news goes minimalist

Renan Borelli   Developing loyalty means developing your talent

Justin Kosslyn   Text hits a tipping point

Shalabh Upadhyay   A culture clash on India’s growing Internet

Mike Isaac   The old exit doors for digital media companies are closing

Adam Smith   Platforms will have to help rebuild trust in news

Alexandra Borchardt   Newsrooms need to build trust with their journalists, not just the audience

Elva Ramirez   News — but make it cinematic

Joe Amditis   Give the audience a seat at the table

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   The most beautiful sentence in 2019 is “No.”

Libby Bawcombe   Haikus of the news

Pia Frey   You can’t solve a crisis without treating it as a crisis

Seema Yasmin   We will create our own spaces

Victor Pickard   We will finally confront systemic market failure

Rebecca Lee Sanchez   We are all actors in the running rampant of political theater

Jeremy Gilbert   AI finally becomes helpful

Matt Waite   “I went to Node.js because I wished to live deliberately”

Patrick Butler   Measuring impact will increase audience trust

Christa Scharfenberg and Vickie Baranetsky   The year of the lawsuit

Kainaz Amaria   We consider who’s behind the camera

Kyra Darnton   A shift to depth in video

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   A long, slow slog, with no one coming to the rescue

Craig Newmark   The end of “loudspeakers for liars”

Michael Grant   More newsrooms experiment their way to success

Alberto Cairo   A year of uncertainty and confidence

Simon Rogers   Data journalism becomes a global field

Celeste LeCompte   Local news needs local conversation to survive

Don Day   Timewalls and other reader revenue experiments

Mat Yurow   Content competition from the tech companies

Steve Henn   Smart speakers get smarter

Elite Truong   What do we owe the next generation?

Cherian George   Fake news wins in Asia

Callie Schweitzer   The rise of the conveners

Charo Henríquez   Pivot to journalism

Shannon McGregor   More bogus embedded tweets in our stories

Pablo Boczkowski   Reimagining the media for post-institutional times

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Podcasting battles East Coast bias

Kate Myers   Journalism continues to be bad for democracy

Steve Grove   A reckoning for tech’s work with news

Rodney Gibbs   A bright — and young — year for audio

Joshua Darr   The nationalization of political news will accelerate

Linda Solomon Wood   The year of the climate reporter

Elizabeth Dunbar   Local reporters reflect on what’s not important