Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: CEO Mark Thompson on offering more and more New York Times (and charging more for it)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Sept. 30, 2019, 1 p.m.
Audience & Social
LINK: www.wsj.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Christine Schmidt   |   September 30, 2019

Truly too good to be true: Facebook isn’t going to pay most publishers for the content featured in its forthcoming news tab this fall, The Wall Street Journal reports. Instead, expect only about one in four to receive some content licensing cash.

The tab, launching as soon as the end of October, will draw from 200 news outlets, the Journal’s Lukas Alpert and Sahil Patel reported Monday morning:

A person familiar with the matter said Facebook had never planned to pay all the news outlets whose content it would link to in its news section. The plan is similar to what Facebook has done with its Watch section, which includes videos not paid for by Facebook, the person said. Taking into account companies that own multiple publications, Facebook will pay fees to about one-quarter of the organizations that will be involved at launch, the person said.

The “here for a good time, not for a long time” funding approach has been one of Facebook’s go-to measures when launching a new product like Facebook Live or Facebook Watch. These carrot sticks contributed to the much maligned “pivot to video”, which contributed to news outlets running out of runway to pivot to a sustainable method while Facebook and other platforms showcased their digital advertising prowess.

The “Top News” tab, though, is supposed to be material that publisher would already be pushing out anyway. The tab plans emerged shortly after the 50-50 revenue-sharing Apple News+ was introduced, which baked a longer financial relationship with news publishers as part of its news system. The top per-publisher numbers Facebook is floating, according to previous reporting by the Journal and CNN’s Dylan Byers, is between $2 million and $3 million per year for three years. It’s unclear how the outlets that will receive the money will be chosen, though outlets like Dow Jones, the Washington Post, The New York Times, BuzzFeed, and The Philadelphia Inquirer have been in talks to at least be included in the special section.

Laura Hazard Owen rounded up the buzz around the news tab (one month to go, folks!) earlier this month. The tab will include around 25 human editors under the guidance of former journalist Anne Kornblut, drawing from a bucket of links from 200 (politically diverse, but not Infowars) outlets questionably deemed trustworthy by Facebook users last year.

Getting more reputable news visible on Facebook = good. Following money dangled without a long-term plan = not good. The impact of Facebook’s news tab, on the industry and on the news consumption of Facebook users = unclear.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: CEO Mark Thompson on offering more and more New York Times (and charging more for it)
The “failing” New York Times’ news operation now employs more than 1,700 journalists, up nearly 50 percent from a decade ago. It has nearly 5 million subscribers, triple its print-era peak. Now it’s preparing to up the price.
Nattering nabobs of news criticism: 50 years ago today, Spiro Agnew laid out a blueprint for attacking the press
“In his attacks on television news, Agnew struck a chord with conservatives who had long regarded the media with suspicion. Nixon later called Agnew’s speech a ‘turning point’ in his presidency.”
Is Big Entertainment funding great work in podcasting or gentrifying the ecosystem?
Plus: The overlap between podcasts and retail politics, the under-examined world of copcasts, and a message to you, from Rudy.