I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.
The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.
Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.
In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”
Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”
Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.
The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)
We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.
I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.
Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.
I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.
The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.
Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.
In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”
Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”
Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.
The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)
We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.
I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.
Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Mario García Think small (screen)
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments