The debate over the use of AI technology in journalism is heating up again after the release of the revolutionary ChatGPT Assistant, currently in its research preview phase.
If you haven’t had a chance to mess around with ChatGPT yet, I highly recommend it — you know, for science. Personally, I’m intrigued by its ability to generate documentation and planning materials. Things like workshop agendas, project outlines, and discussion overviews. The kind of stuff that, in most cases, nobody really puts a byline on or attributes to any specific individual.
But that really only scratches the surface of what this tool (and its inevitable successors and imitators) will be able to do in the future. For journalists and news organizations, this kind of leap in technological capacity presents almost as many ethical quandaries and questions (if not more) as it does possibilities and opportunities. And this one feels like a big leap.
I won’t get into the ethics here, since there are many people who are vastly more qualified than me to have that conversation. In fact, this is probably at least the fourth or fifth Nieman Lab prediction you’ve seen that focuses on this topic or some aspect of it.
Instead, I’ll talk about how I think this kind of tech could hypothetically impact small- and medium-sized local news organizations — particularly those with less than five full-time people on staff.
The ability to quickly generate documents, instructions, guides, and various elements of internal infrastructure could save independent and hyperlocal news publishers an incredible amount of time and effort.
Instantly generating summaries of public meetings and documents, creating tweets and social posts from news stories, drafting scripts for news broadcasts, even suggesting different headline variations — all at the click of a button — would be a game-changer for news organizations that are already strapped for people and resources. The same thing goes for generating invoices, public records requests, and even basic outreach emails.
That’s more time that could (and should) be spent reporting or engaging with community members. It could also help make local news content more accessible to people with disabilities, people who speak English as a second language, and people who might not usually come across local news stories in their current format.
Not to mention the implications of ChatGPT’s ability to generate code using natural-language inputs. Ask it to make something and it will (maybe) make it for you.
What’s wild is that all of those benefits and more don’t include what will happen when you pair ChatGPT with other tools and services, like Zapier or Notion.
The potential drawbacks and ethical concerns are equally obvious and perhaps more consequential, but many of them are ultimately tied to the way capitalism and the profit motive operate within and in opposition to public-service journalism. (Another topic that I’m more than happy to discuss at length, but won’t get into here.)
Regardless, this is a thing now. And the optimistic possibilities — along with their pessimistic and dystopian counterparts — are likely going to play a huge role in the future of journalism.
(Also, no, ChatGPT did not help me write this post — though I was very tempted.)
Joe Amditis is assistant director of products and events at the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University.
The debate over the use of AI technology in journalism is heating up again after the release of the revolutionary ChatGPT Assistant, currently in its research preview phase.
If you haven’t had a chance to mess around with ChatGPT yet, I highly recommend it — you know, for science. Personally, I’m intrigued by its ability to generate documentation and planning materials. Things like workshop agendas, project outlines, and discussion overviews. The kind of stuff that, in most cases, nobody really puts a byline on or attributes to any specific individual.
But that really only scratches the surface of what this tool (and its inevitable successors and imitators) will be able to do in the future. For journalists and news organizations, this kind of leap in technological capacity presents almost as many ethical quandaries and questions (if not more) as it does possibilities and opportunities. And this one feels like a big leap.
I won’t get into the ethics here, since there are many people who are vastly more qualified than me to have that conversation. In fact, this is probably at least the fourth or fifth Nieman Lab prediction you’ve seen that focuses on this topic or some aspect of it.
Instead, I’ll talk about how I think this kind of tech could hypothetically impact small- and medium-sized local news organizations — particularly those with less than five full-time people on staff.
The ability to quickly generate documents, instructions, guides, and various elements of internal infrastructure could save independent and hyperlocal news publishers an incredible amount of time and effort.
Instantly generating summaries of public meetings and documents, creating tweets and social posts from news stories, drafting scripts for news broadcasts, even suggesting different headline variations — all at the click of a button — would be a game-changer for news organizations that are already strapped for people and resources. The same thing goes for generating invoices, public records requests, and even basic outreach emails.
That’s more time that could (and should) be spent reporting or engaging with community members. It could also help make local news content more accessible to people with disabilities, people who speak English as a second language, and people who might not usually come across local news stories in their current format.
Not to mention the implications of ChatGPT’s ability to generate code using natural-language inputs. Ask it to make something and it will (maybe) make it for you.
What’s wild is that all of those benefits and more don’t include what will happen when you pair ChatGPT with other tools and services, like Zapier or Notion.
The potential drawbacks and ethical concerns are equally obvious and perhaps more consequential, but many of them are ultimately tied to the way capitalism and the profit motive operate within and in opposition to public-service journalism. (Another topic that I’m more than happy to discuss at length, but won’t get into here.)
Regardless, this is a thing now. And the optimistic possibilities — along with their pessimistic and dystopian counterparts — are likely going to play a huge role in the future of journalism.
(Also, no, ChatGPT did not help me write this post — though I was very tempted.)
Joe Amditis is assistant director of products and events at the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University.
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.