Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
What’s the view from Europe on where news is headed? Check out these videos from Newsgeist
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 24, 2010, 5 a.m.

FairWarning: A beat-focused model for a nonprofit investigative startup

It’s a cliché because it’s true: Investigative reporting is the core of the journalism that democracy requires to thrive. It’s good news, then, that this morning brings the launch of another nonprofit news outlet focused solely on I-reporting — this one, under the direction of a pair of former Los Angeles Times reporters. FairWarning aims, like its fellow investigative outfits, “to provide robust, public interest journalism”; unlike its fellow outlets, though, the site has carved a concentrated focus within its broader mission: It will cover, exclusively, consumer-driven issues of heath, safety, and corporate conduct.

“I always felt like, even back when times were fatter and more prosperous, there wasn’t enough of this work being done in traditional media,” says Myron Levin, a veteran consumer-interest investigative reporter and FairWarning’s founder and editor. “These stories are a little bit technical; to some people they’re a little bit boring. They’re not sexy, usually.” What they are, though, is important. FairWarning’s name, Levin told me, is meant to evoke “the shared responsibility between consumers and businesses” when it comes to health and safety. And its goal, he says, is “to provide a flow for this kind of news and information, and to see it reach a wider audience.”

In terms of the content mix it offers, FairWarning is akin to its counterpart outlets. In addition to deep-dive treatments of health and safety issues (currently: a spotlight on the trail of victims of a combustible line of pickup trucks; an examination of undercounting and cheating in workplace injury reports; and a look at the politics of regulating all-terrain vehicles to minimize injuries and deaths), the site has a blog, News and Notes, which will contain summaries of stories and more personalized takes on their findings. Levin and Joanna Lin, the site’s assistant editor, also plan to offer daily aggregations of other outlets’ investigations in the health-and-safety arena — the whole do what you do best and link to the rest idea — and of legal and regulatory news more generally. It’s about “creating a portal,” says Lin, “where people can find this information, even if we weren’t the producers of it.”

Social media, it almost goes without saying, will play a role in that creation. FairWarning has a Twitter feed and a Facebook page — the followers are few at this point, but the hope is to build audiences on them over time. At the same time, “I know there are a lot of people — especially the people who would benefit from the information in our stories — who aren’t on Twitter or Facebook,” Lin told me. “So we’re still looking to try to find as many ways as we can to reach them. If they’re reading newspapers, we want to be in newspapers. If they’re on Twitter, we want to be on Twitter. For us, the medium is secondary to just getting the message across.”

Structurally, in other words, FairWarning is a concentrated version of the cross-platform strategies employed by many of the nonprofit outfits that are emerging to fill the void left as traditional investigative teams have disintegrated. It differs from those other outlets, though, not only in size, but in scope. Generally, investigative startups focus on the broad universe of investigative reporting, narrowing their coverage (or not) according to geographical interests — national (ProPublica), regional (California Watch), local (Voice of San Diego) — more than anything else. Reporters may have beats within their respective newsrooms, but overall, the outlets aim to produce “investigations in the public interest” that are aimed at a particular public.

FairWarning marks a move from that model. It defines itself not according to a geographical area, but rather to a rhetorical one. It’s a beat unto itself.

Because of that, collaboration and partnerships will be key. Which can be something of a challenge. “There’s kind of a balance we’re trying to strike,” Lin says. “We’re trying to appeal to people at smaller papers, because we think our stuff will be of interest to their readers — but a lot of these papers are saying, ‘Well, our readers only care about things in this specific region.’ So we’re trying to work around that.”

An added challenge: The staff doing that work is — for now, anyway — small (or, in startupese, nimble). Levin and Lin share a small office in Sherman Oaks, and they’re assisted by three part-time researcher-reporters — journalism masters’ students — who work remotely: Bridget Huber and Jill Replogle from UC Berkeley, and Matthew Richmond from USC. (The outlet turned to students not only for economic reasons, but also because, as Lin puts it, “the industry has a responsibility for its own survival, really, to bring up a new generation of reporters.”) Diana Hoff, administrator of the Portland-based Renaissance Foundation, one of FairWarning’s funders, provides business-side assistance, and an all-star board — including Margaret Engel, Charles Lewis, Vernon Loeb, Bill Marimow, and Henry Weinstein — provide insight and oversight.

FairWarning also has a broad initial slate of financial supporters. The Charles Evans Foundation is the outfit’s primary funder, but FairWarning also receives assistance from, in addition to Renaissance, Ethics and Excellence in Journalism, Public Welfare, and the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University’s School of Communication. “We’ve lucked out, because there’s so many people with their hands out right now, trying to get these journalism projects going,” Levin notes. And there’s a “Contribute” section on FairWarning.org to give readers the option of helping out. Still, that nagging question — how will we pay for it? — will be a constant one, and one FairWarning will have to address even as it sets about telling stories and building a brand. Realistically, Levin says, “we have about a year’s money. We’re not out of the woods.”

POSTED     March 24, 2010, 5 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
What’s the view from Europe on where news is headed? Check out these videos from Newsgeist
From digital security to metrics, algorithms to wearables, here’s some of what a bunch of journalists and technologists were thinking about at their recent Helsinki conference.
Here are the best links, resources, and roundups from SRCCON, the conference for journalism code
From ad viewability and machine learning to journalist burnout and remote work, the conference in Minneapolis brought together some of the smartest news nerds to talk shop.
“Learning to write again”: A Duke team tests a new way of reporting on New York City government
This summer, a team of students is testing whether a database-driven, structured journalism model can work well on topics like urban policing and Uber.
What to read next
2843
tweets
A blow for mobile advertising: The next version of Safari will let users block ads on iPhones and iPads
Think making money on mobile advertising is hard now? Think how much more difficult it will be with a significant share of your audience is blocking all your ads — all with a simple download from the App Store.
1763For news organizations, this was the most important set of Apple announcements in years
A new Flipboard-clone with massive potential reach, R.I.P. Newsstand, and news stories embedded deeper inside iOS — it was a big day for news on iPhones and iPads.
762Newsonomics: 10 numbers that define the news business today
From video to social, from mobile to paywalls — these data points help define where we are in the “future of news” today, like it or not.
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Yahoo
Upworthy
The Seattle Times
The Dish
Center for Public Integrity
Ann Arbor News
Gannett
St. Louis Globe-Democrat
FiveThirtyEight
Tucson Citizen
New England Center for Investigative Reporting
Windy Citizen